The Effect of Conventional and Nanoformulation Herbicide on Sphagneticola Trilobata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2023.6942Keywords:
Conventional herbicide, Nanoherbicide, MCPA, ZMCPA, Sphagneticola trilobataAbstract
The conventional herbicide 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) provide substantial risk to the environment such as contamination of soil and groundwater. The overuse application of conventional herbicide can leave harmful residues in soil and be washed off as runoff, thus causes toxic effect to nontarget organism. For instance, MCPA can cause toxicity to the freshwater organisms such as Daphnia magna and alga Selenastrum capricornutum. Zinc oxide as nanomaterials that are intercalated with 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (ZMCPA) herbicide may be useful to resolve the problems associated with MCPA. Nanoherbicide are known to provide a better penetration of active substances hence reduces the amount of herbicide to be applied. The nanostructured herbicide such as ZMCPA could substantially replace the conventional herbicide MCPA if it able to kill the targeted weeds efficiently and have a low risk to the environment. Therefore, it is important to compare the differences of herbicidal activity of MCPA and ZMCPA. The objective of this research is to determine the effects of MCPA and ZMCPA on growth and pigment content of Sphagneticola trilobata. The 2nd objective of this research is to measure the physiological effect and effectiveness of herbicidal activity between the conventional and nanoformulation against Sphagneticola trilobata. The preliminary study was conducted to determine a minimal concentration for MCPA to exert its effect on Sphagneticola trilobata. Then, in the main research, Sphagneticola trilobata was exposed to different concentrations of MCPA and ZMCPA in low, medium and high concentrations. The effect of MCPA and ZMCPA on growth and pigment content of Sphagneticola trilobata was observed at 7, 14 and 21 days, respectively. The results indicated there were no obvious differences in plant growth and pigment content observed between treatment of MCPA and ZMCPA at the same exposure concentration at 7, 14 and 21 days, respectively. MCPA showed higher herbicide efficacy than ZMCPA.
HIGHLIGHTS
- Nanoherbicide Development: The intercalation of zinc layered hydroxide (ZLH) with MCPA resulted in ZMCPA, a nanoherbicide with improved delivery and penetration capabilities compared to conventional herbicides.
- Potential Replacement for Conventional Herbicides: Nanostructured herbicides like ZMCPA have the potential to replace conventional herbicides like MCPA due to their numerous benefits in addressing issues associated with traditional herbicides.
- Comparable Herbicidal Effectiveness: The study evaluated the herbicidal activity of MCPA and ZMCPA on Sphagneticola trilobata and found that both formulations inhibited the growth of the weed to a similar extent after 7, 14, and 21 days, indicating comparable efficacy between the conventional and nanoformulation herbicides.
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
Downloads
Metrics
References
D Abdollahdokht, Y Gao, S Faramarz, A Poustforoosh, M Abbasi, G Asadikaram and MH Nematollahi. Conventional agrochemicals towards nano-biopesticides: An overview on recent advances. Chem. Biol. Tech. Agr. 2022; 9, 13.
G Kumari, S Kalita, Z Hussain, NC Deka and BR Meena. Nanoencapsulation to control herbicide residues and resistances: A review. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci. 2021; 23, 140-8.
A Matloob, ME Safdar, T Abbas, F Aslam, A Khaliq, A Tanveer, A Rehman and AR Chadhar. Challenges and prospects for weed management in Pakistan. Crop Protect. 2020; 134, 104724.
NSIM Foad, NN Dzulkifli, A Abdullah, ML Jadam, SAISM Ghazali. Synthesis and characterisation of zinc layered hydroxide intercalated with 2- methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid and its controlled release application. ASM Sci. J. 2021; 15, 1-10.
C Keswani, SP Singh, L Cueto, C García-Estrada, S Mezaache-Aichour, TR Glare, R Borriss, SP Singh, MA Blázquez and E Sansinenea. Auxins of microbial origin and their use in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 104, 8549-65.
R Busi, DE Goggin, IM Heap, MJ Horak, M Jugulam, RA Masters, RM Napier, DS Riar, NM Satchivi, J Torra, P Westra and TR Wright. Weed resistance to synthetic auxin herbicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018; 74, 2265-76.
T Guha, G Gopal, R Kundu and A Mukherjee. Nanocomposites for delivering agrochemicals: A comprehensive review. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2020; 68, 3691-702.
M Urbaniak and E Mierzejewska-Sinner. Biological remediation of phenoxy herbicide-contaminated environments. Bioremediation. IntechOpen, London, 2019, p. 1-22.
SC Mali, S Raj and R Trivedi. Nanotechnology a novel approach to enhance crop productivity. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2020; 24, 10081.
SN Raj, ES Anooj, K Rajendran and S Vallinayagam. A comprehensive review on regulatory invention of nano pesticides in agricultural nano formulation and food system. J. Mol. Struct. 2021; 1239, 130517.
AB Bombo, AES Pereira, MG Lusa, EDM Oliveira, JLD Oliveira, EVR Campos, MBD Jesus, HC Oliveira, LF Fraceto and JLS Mayer. A mechanistic view of interactions of a nanoherbicide with target organism. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2019; 67, 4453-62.
Z Wang, X Sun, S Ru, J Wang, J Xiong, L Yang, L Hao, J Zhang and X Zhang. Effects of co-exposure of the triazine herbicides atrazine, prometryn and terbutryn on Phaeodactylum tricornutum photosynthesis and nutritional value. Sci. Total Environ. 2022; 807, 1506.
V Takeshita, BTD Sousa, AC Preisler, LB Carvalho, ADES Pereira, VL Tornisielo, G Dalazen, HC Oliveira and LF Fraceto. Foliar absorption and field herbicidal studies of atrazine-loaded polymeric nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021; 418, 126350.
PL Rajagopal, AK Anjana, KR Sreejith, K Premaletha and S Aneeshia. Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski-A phytochemical review. World Wide J. Multidisciplinary Res. Dev. 2020; 6, 1-3.
HT Chi, NTL Thuong and BTK Ly. Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) pruski (asteraceae) methanol extract induces apoptosis in leukemia cells through suppression of bcr/abl. Plants 2021; 10, 980.
V Mardina, Mastura, Hamdani and E Sufriadi. Flower of Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski from Aceh, Indonesia: Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity on HeLa cells. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020; 1007, 12182.
L Li, I Fatimah, G Purwiandono, I Sahroni, S Sagadevan, W Chun-Oh, SAIS M Ghazali and RA Doong. Recyclable catalyst of ZnO/SiO prepared from salacca leaves ash for sustainable biodiesel conversion. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2022; 40, 134-43.
Y Kurashina, T Yamashita, S Kurabayashi, K Takemura and K Ando. Growth control of leaf lettuce with exposure to underwater ultrasound and dissolved oxygen supersaturation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019; 51, 292-7.
E Saptiningsih, K Dewi, Santosa and YA Purwestri. Clonal integration of the invasive plant Wedelia trilobata (L.) hitch in stress of flooding type combination. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2018; 9, 7526.
SH Sarijo, SAISM Ghazali and MZ Hussein. Synthesis of dual herbicides-intercalated hydrotalcite-like nanohybrid compound with simultaneous controlled release property. J. Porous Mater. 2015; 22, 473-80.
HF Fawwaz, S Lathifatunnisa, NM Hemelda and R Yuniati. Kaolin application to increase lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growth under suboptimal watering condition. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021; 948, 012087.
GCL Ee, SA Izzaddin, M Rahmani, MA Sukari and HL Lee. γ-Mangostin and rubraxanthone, two potential lead compounds for anti-cancer activity against CEM-SS cell line. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2006; 12, 138-43.
VD Rajput, T Minkina, A Fedorenko, N Chernikova, T Hassan, S Mandzhieva, S Sushkova, V Lysenko, MA Soldatov and M Burachevskaya. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on physiological and anatomical indices in spring barley tissues. Nanomaterials 2021; 11, 1722.
KDA Ghani, S Nayan, SAISM Ghazali, LA Shafie and S Nayan. Critical internal and external factors that affect firms strategic planning. Int. Res. J. Finance Econ. 2010; 51, 50-8.
BT Sousa, ADES Pereira, LF Fraceto, HCD Oliveira and G Dalazen. Effectiveness of nanoatrazine in post-emergent control of the tolerant weed Digitalis insularis. J. Plant Protect. Res. 2020; 60, 185-92.
J Wu, Y Zhai, FA Monikh, D Arenas-Lago, R Grillo, MG Vijver and WJGM Peijnenburg. The differences between the effects of a nanoformulation and a conventional form of atrazine to lettuce: Physiological responses, defense mechanisms, and nutrient displacement. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2021; 69, 12527-40.
GFM Sousa, DG Gomes, EVR Campos, JL Oliveira, LF Fraceto, R Stolf-Moreira and HC Oliveira. Post-emergence herbicidal activity of nanoatrazine against susceptible weeds. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018; 6, 12.
S Kumar, M Nehra, N Dilbaghi, G Marrazza, AA Hassan and KH Kim. Nano-based smart pesticide formulations: Emerging opportunities for agriculture. J. Contr. Release 2019; 294, 131-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Walailak University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
