Variability of Physicochemical Database and Trypsin Inhibitory Activity of Komak (Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet) Beans with Distinct Colors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7927Keywords:
Amino acid, Antinutrients, Nutrients, Phytic acid, TanninsAbstract
Komak (Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet) is a highly productive plant used for sustainable cultivation. However, beans are currently underutilized. A complete database including physicochemical characteristics is important for developing new foods derived from komak beans. This study aimed to determine the physical (weight, dimensions and color) and chemical (macromolecules, amino acids, sugars, minerals, phytic acid, tannin and volatile compounds) profiles, as well as the trypsin inhibitory activity of different varieties of komak beans, viz. white and black beans. The levels of the studied parameters differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the beans. However, the common profile of komak beans was characterized by a moderate level of protein (26 %), high carbohydrate (66 %) and low fat (2 %), with a weight ranging from 25 to 45 g and low anti-nutritional factor expressed as trypsin inhibitory activity (2 TIU/mg). Additionally, analytical results using HS-SPME-GC/MS revealed that 1-octen-3-ol and benzyl alcohol were the main unpleasant volatile compounds produced upon heating beans. The major mineral compound in black beans is potassium, whereas the white variety contains higher amounts of magnesium, calcium and iron. Interestingly, both beans provided favorable compounds contributing to the umami taste, as the most dominant amino acids were glutamic and aspartic acids. Finally, as white beans were lower in antinutritive compounds (phytic acid and tannin), this measure may encourage further studies to expand the development of this variety to promote underutilized beans as alternative food sources.
HIGHLIGHTS
- Komak is a productive and sustainable crop with underexploited beans
- The 2 types of komak beans were medium-sized, containing moderate protein, high carbohydrates, low fat and low trypsin inhibitory activity
- 1-Octen-3-ol and benzyl alcohol were the major unpleasant volatile compounds produced by the beans
- White beans have high magnesium, calcium and iron; black beans are primarily rich in potassium
- White beans had less anti-nutritive phytic acid and tannin than black beans
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
Downloads
Metrics
References
BL Maass. Origin, domestication and global dispersal of Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet (Fabaceae): Current understanding. Legume Perspect. 2016; 13, 5-8.
O Robotham and M Chapman. Population genetic analysis of Hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet, Leguminosae) indicates an East African origin and variation in drought tolerance. Genet. Resources Crop Evol. 2017; 64, 139-48.
QD Fuller. African crops in prehistoric South Asia: A critical review. In: K Neumann, A Butler and S Kahlheber (Eds.). Food, fuel and fields: Progress in Africa archaeobotany. Heinrich-Barth-Institut, Köln, Germany, 2003, p. 239-71.
B Cook, B Pengelly, R Schultze-Kraft, M Taylor, S Burkart, JA Arango and M Peter. Lablab purpureus in Tropical forages: An interactive selection tool-digital, Available at: https://www. tropicalforages.info/text/entities/lablab_purpureus.htm?zoom_highlight=lablab, accessed August 2020.
National Research Council. Lost crops of Africa. Vol II. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2006, p. 190-205.
JS Missanga, PB Venkataramana and PA Ndakidemi. Recent developments in Lablab purpureus genomics: A focus on drought stress tolerance and use of genomic resources to develop stress‐resilient varieties. Legume Sci. 2021; 3, e99.
D Setyorini. Komak: Sumber protein nabati untuk daerah kering (in Indonesian). Warta Plasma Nutfah Indonesia 2008; 20, 8-10.
R Azkiyah, A Soegianto and K Kuswanto. Observasi tanaman kacang komak (Lablab purpureus L. sweet) di kabupaten Probolinggo, Jawa Timur (in Indonesian). Jurnal Produksi Tanaman 2018; 6, 2363-71.
S Brown and B Pengelly. Lablab, Available at: https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/pastures/ Html/Lablab.htm#Establishment, accessed September 2020.
Sudaryono, A Taufiq and A Wijanarko. Peluang peningkatan produksi kedelai di Indonesia (in Indonesian). In: Suyamto, A Widjono, Hermanto and H Kasim (Eds.). Kedelai: Teknik produksi dan pengembangan. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor, Indonesia, 2007, p. 130-63.
A Subagio. Characterization of hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet) seeds from Indonesia and their protein isolate. Food Chem. 2006; 95, 65-70.
SM Kilonzi, AO Makokha and GM Kenji. Physical characteristics, proximate composition and anti-nutritional factors in grains of lablab bean (Lablab purpureus) genotypes from Kenya. J. Appl. Biosci. 2017; 114, 11289-98.
MMS Ariina, SP Kanaujia, P Alila, KS Sebastian and K Bier. Nutritional & anti-nutritional profile of Indian bean: A mini review. Just Agr. 2021; 1, 1-5.
WSU Roland, L Pouvreau, J Curran, FVD Velde and PMTD Kok. Flavor aspects of pulse ingredients. Cereal Chem. 2017; 94, 58-65.
I Rajhi, B Baccouri, F Rajhi, J Hammami, M Souibgui, M Amri, H Mhadhbi and G Flamini. Evaluation of germination effect on volatile compounds of different faba bean cultivars using HS-SPME/GC-MS. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022; 112, 104692.
KJ Simonyan, YD Yiljep, OB Oyatoyan and GS Bawa. Effects of moisture content on some physical properties of Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet seeds. Agr. Eng. Int. 2009; 11, 1279.
EN Wafula, IN Wainaina, C Buvé, PK Kinyanjui, W Saeys, DN Sila and MEG Hendrickx. Prediction of cooking times of freshly harvested common beans and their susceptibility to develop the hard-to-cook defect using near infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Eng. 2021; 298, 110495.
AOAC International. Official methods of analysis. 21st eds. AOAC International, Maryland, 2019.
Waters Corporation. Acquity UPLC H-Class and H-Class bio amino acid analysis system guide. Waters Corporation, Manchester, 2012.
R Dahl-Lassen, JV Hecke, H Jørgensen, C Bukh, B Andersen and JK Schjoerring. High-throughput analysis of amino acids in plant materials by single quadrupole mass spectrometry. Plants Meth. 2018; 14, 8.
A Fitriani, U Santoso and S Supriyadi. Conventional processing affects nutritional and antinutritional components and in vitro protein digestibility in Kabau (Archidendron bubalinum). Int. J. Food Sci. 2021; 23, 3057805.
NRL A’yuni, Y Marsono, DW Marseno and P Triwitono. Physical characteristics, nutrients and antinutrients composition of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) grown in Indonesia. Food Res. 2022; 6, 53-63.
M Olu, EA Alamu and SO Oluwajoba. Effect of germination on the anti nutritional and toxic factors of cowpea. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. Eng. 2014; 4, 49-53.
ER Coscueta, ME Pintado, GA Picó, G Knobel, CE Boschetti, LP Malpiedi and BB Nerli. Continuous method to determine the trypsin inhibitor activity in soybean flour. Food Chem. 2017; 214, 156-61.
R Akkad, E Kharraz, J Han, JD House and JM Curtis. Characterisation of the volatile flavour compounds in low and high tannin faba beans (Vicia faba Var. Minor) grown in Alberta, Canada. Food Res. Int. 2019; 120, 285-94.
M Astawan, T Wresdiyati, S Widowati, SH Bintari and N Ichsani. Phsyco-chemical characteristics and functional properties of tempe made from different soybeans varieties. Jurnal Pangan 2013; 22, 241-52.
IE Ezeagu, B Maziya-Dixon and G Tarawali. Seed characteristics and nutrient and antinutrient composition of 12 Mucuna accessions from Nigeria. Trop. Subtropical Agroecosystems 2003; 1, 129-39.
TDS Agostini-Costa, AFP Teodoro, RDBDN Alves, LR Braga, IF Ribeiro, JP Silva, LG Quintana and ML Burle. Total phenolics, flavonoids, tannins and antioxidant activity of lima beans conserved in a Brazilian Genebank. Ciência Rural 2014; 45, 335-41.
ES Buckman, I Oduro, WA Plahar and C Tortoe. Determination of the chemical and functional properties of yam bean (Pachyrhizus erosus (L.) Urban) flour for food systems. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018; 6, 457-63.
O Tas, U Ertugrul, L Grunin and MH Oztop. An investigation of functional quality characteristics and water interactions of navy bean, chickpea, pea, and lentil flours. Legume Sci. 2022; 4, e136.
AM Yahaya, UR Sinniah and A Misran. Seed quality of lablab beans (Lablab purpureus L.) as influenced by drying methods and storage temperature. Agronomy 2022; 12, 699.
MK Meena, MB Chetti and CM Nawalagatti. Seed physiological and biochemical parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by different packaging materials and storage conditions. Pharma Innovat. J. 2022; 11, 924-33.
B Muktar, A Ibrahim and M Jibril. Proximate and elemental analysis of cowpea, kidney and sweet cowpea beans sold in Kawo market, Kaduna State, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. 2022; 26, 246-8.
AN Hasan, BV Aafrin and U Antony. In vitro evaluation of functional properties of protein from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and its applications in food. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci. 2015; 17, 181-7.
SK Du, H Jiang, X Yu and JL Jane. Physicochemical and functional properties of whole legume flour. LWT 2014; 55, 308-13.
VT Sinegovskaya, VV Ochkurova and MO Sinegovskiy. Protein and fat content in soybean cultivar seeds of various genetic origins. Russ. Agr. Sci. 2020; 46, 554-9.
GA Nkwocha, KU Anukam and OC Adumanya. Evaluation of the nutritional potentials of three species of Canavalia for use in livestock diets. J. Sustain. Tech. 2021; 11, 86-92.
R Pathania, P Chawla, H Khan, R Kaushik and MA Khan. An assessment of potential nutritive and medicinal properties of Mucuna pruriens: A natural food legume. 3 Biotech 2020; 10, 261.
D Anaemene and G Fadupin. Anti-nutrient reduction and nutrient retention capacity of fermentation, germination and combined germination-fermentation in legume processing. Appl. Food Res. 2022; 2, 100059.
S Sharma, M Kaur, R Goyal and BS Gill. Physical characteristics and nutritional composition of some new soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) genotypes. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2014; 51, 551-7.
AC Godswill. Proximate composition and functional properties of different grain flour composites for industrial applications. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019; 2, 43-64.
H Twinomuhwezi, CG Awuchi and M Rachael. Comparative study of the proximate composition and functional properties of composite flours of amaranth, rice, millet, and soybean. Am. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020; 6, 6-19.
HM Habib, SW Theuri, EE Kheadr and FE Mohamed. Functional, bioactive, biochemical, and physicochemical properties of the Dolichos lablab bean. Food Funct. 2017; 8, 872-80.
TA Teka, N Retta, G Bultosa, H Admassu and T Astatkie. Protein fractions, in vitro protein digestibility and amino acid composition of select cowpea varieties grown in Ethiopia. Food Biosci. 2020; 36, 100634.
S Gurusamy, CS Vidhya, BY Khasherao and A Shanmugam. Pulses for health and their varied ways of processing and consumption in India - A review. Appl. Food Res. 2022; 2, 100171.
DT Shaahu, FG Kaankuka and U Okpanachi. Proximate, amino acid, anti-nutritional factor and mineral composition of different varieties of raw Lablab purpureus seeds. Int. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2015; 4, 157-61.
E Purwanti, W Priharta and A Fauzi. The diversity of seed size and nutrient content of lablab bean from three locations in Indonesia. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag. Sci. 2019; 5, 395-402.
Y Assefa, N Bajjalieh, S Archontoulis, S Casteel, D Davidson, P Kovács, S Naeve and LA Ciampitti. Spatial characterization of soybean yield and quality (amino acids, oil, and protein) for United States. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8, 14653.
HT Palupi, T Estiasih, Yunianto and A Sutrisno. Physicochemical and protein characterization of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L) seed. LWT 2022; 6, 168-77.
AA Rezende, MTB Pacheco, VSND Silva and TAPDC Ferreira. Nutritional and protein quality of dry Brazilian beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Sci. Tech. 2018; 38, 421-7.
KA Millar, E Gallagher, R Burke, S McCarthy and C Barry-Ryan. Proximate composition and anti-nutritional factors of fava-bean (Vicia faba), green-pea and yellow-pea (Pisum sativum) flour. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019; 82, 103233.
K Mungunkhuyag, Z Bayarsukh, O Ganzorig and B Batdorj. Chemical composition and nutritional value of some varieties of soybean cultivated in Mongolia. Mongolian J. Agr. Sci. 2021; 33, 31-7.
HL Bhardwaj and AA Hamama. Fatty acids and sugars in lablab seed produced in Virginia (A non-traditional location). J. Agr. Sci. 2019; 11, 28-34.
LH Allen. Legumes. In: B Caballero (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human nutrition. 3rd eds. Academic Press, Massachusetts, 2013.
C Hall, C Hillen and JG Robinson. Composition, nutritional value, and health benefits of pulses. Cereal Chem. 2017; 94, 11-31.
K Shubha, AK Choudhary, AK Dubey, K Tripathi, R Kumar, S Kumar, A Mukherjee, M Tamta, U Kumar, S Kumar, J Layek and M Tamta. Evaluation of lablab bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet] genotypes: Unveiling superior pod yield, nutritional quality, and collar rot resistance. Front. Nutr. 2023; 10, 1243923.
AG Jacob, DI Etong and A Tijjani. Proximate, mineral and anti-nutritional compositions of melon (Citrullus lanatus) seeds. Br. J. Res. 2015; 2, 142-51.
Ö Çakir, C Uçarli, Ç Tarhan, M Pekmez and N Turgut-Kara. Nutritional and health benefits of legumes and their distinctive genomic properties. Food Sci. Tech. 2019; 39, 1-12.
V Vadivel and K Janardhanan. Nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of velvet bean: An under-utilized food legume in South India. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000; 51, 279-87.
MC Martínez-Ballesta, R Dominguez-Perles, DA Moreno, B Muries, C Alcaraz-López, E Bastías, C García-Viguera and M Carvajal. Minerals in plant food: Effect of agricultural practices and role in human health. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010; 30, 295-309.
GR Kläsener, ND Ribeiro, CR Casagrande and FD Arns. Consumer preference and the technological and nutritional quality of different bean colours. Acta Sci. Agron. 2019; 42, e43689.
RJ Elin. Assessment of magnesium status for diagnosis and therapy. Magnes. Res. 2010; 23, S194-S198.
U Gröber, J Schmidt and K Kisters. Magnesium in prevention and therapy. Nutrients 2015; 7, 8199-226.
S Kumar and G Pandey. Biofortification of pulses and legumes to enhance nutrition. Heliyon 2020; 6, e03682.
MT Anjulo, MB Doda and CK Kanido. Determination of selected metals and nutritional compositions of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) cultivated in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. J. Agr. Chem. Environ. 2020; 10, 37-56.
AG Godswill, IV Somtochukwu, AO Ikechukwu and EC Kate. Health benefits of micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) and their associated deficiency diseases: A systematic review. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020; 3, 1-32.
V Vadivel. The nutritional and antioxidant contents of wild jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis L. DC.): An under-exploited legume from South Africa. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2019; 10, 35502-8.
C Cerami. Iron nutriture of the fetus, neonate, infant, and child. Ann. Nutr. Metabol. 2017; 71, 8-14.
A Sharma. A review on traditional technology and safety challenges with regard to antinutrients in legume foods. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2021; 58, 2863-83.
DD Angelis, A Pasqualone, I Allegretta, I Porfido, R Terzano, G Squeo and C Summo. Antinutritional factors, mineral composition and functional properties of dry fractionated flours as influenced by the type of pulse. Heliyon 2021; 7, e06177.
L Shi, SD Arntfield and M Nickerson. Changes in levels of phytic acid, lectins and oxalates during soaking and cooking of Canadian pulses. Food Res. Int. 2018; 107, 660-8.
EN Wafula, M Onduso, IN Wainaina, C Buvé, PK Kinyanjui, SM Githiri, W Saeys, DN Sila and M Hendrickx. Antinutrient to mineral molar ratios of raw common beans and their rapid prediction using near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2022; 368, 130773.
P Bangar, RP Glahn, Y Liu, GC Arganosa, S Whiting and TD Warkentin. Iron bioavailability in field pea seeds: Correlations with iron, phytate, and carotenoids. Crop Sci. 2017; 57, 891-902.
YY Zhang, R Stockmann, K Ng and S Ajlouni. Revisiting phytate-element interactions: Implications for iron, zinc and calcium bioavailability, with emphasis on legumes. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022; 62, 1696-712.
MA Osman. Effect of different processing methods, on nutrient composition, antinutrional factors, and in vitro protein digestibility of dolichos lablab bean [Lablab purpureus (L) sweet]. Pakistan J. Nutr. 2007; 6, 299-303.
AM Nakitto, JH Muyonga and D Nakimbugwe. Effects of combined traditional processing methods on the nutritional quality of beans. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015; 3, 233-41.
A Kumar, B Singh, P Raigond, C Sahu, UN Mishra, S Sharma and MK Lal. Phytic acid: Blessing in disguise, a prime compound required for both plant and human nutrition. Food Res. Int. 2021; 142, 110193.
BH Vagadia, SK Vanga and V Raghavan. Inactivation methods of soybean trypsin inhibitor - A review. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2017; 64, 115-25.
S Avilés-Gaxiola, C Chuck-Hernández, MDR Rocha-Pizaña, S García-Lara, LM López-Castillo and SO Serna-Saldívar. Effect of thermal processing and reducing agents on trypsin inhibitor activity and functional properties of soybean and chickpea protein concentrates. LWT 2018; 98, 629-34.
AK Arise, SA Malomo, CI Cynthia, NA Aliyu and RO Arise. Influence of processing methods on the antinutrients, morphology and in-vitro protein digestibility of jack bean. Food Chem. Adv. 2022; 1, 100078.
PS Tresina and VR Mohan. Assessment of nutritional and antinutritional potential of underutilized legumes of the genus Mucuna. Trop. Subtropical Agroecosystems 2013; 16, 155-69.
F Alabi, EG Kiarie, CM Mnisi and V Mlambo. Physical treatment reduces trypsin inhibitor activity and modifies chemical composition of marama bean (Tylosema esculentum). Molecules 2022; 27, 4451.
PK Singh, N Shrivastava, B Sharma and SS Bhagyawant. Effect of domestic processes on chickpea seeds for antinutritional contents and their divergence. Am. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2015; 3, 111-7.
E Sangronis and CJ Machado. Influence of germination on the nutritional quality of Phaseolus vulgaris and Cajanus cajan. LWT 2007; 40, 116-20.
S Sharma, R Goyal and S Barwal. Domestic processing effects on physicochemical, nutritional and anti-nutritional attributes in soybean (Glycine max L. Merill). Int. Food Res. J. 2013; 20, 3203-9.
A Doss, M Pugalenthi, VG Vadivel, G Subhashini and RA Subash. Effects of processing technique on the nutritional composition and antinutrients content of under-utilized food legume Canavalia ensiformis L. DC. Int. Food Res. J. 2011; 18, 965-70.
N Moussou, M Ouazib, J Wanasundara, F Zaidi and L Rubio. Nutrients and non-nutrients composition and in vitro starch digestibility of five Algerian legume seed flours. Int. Food Res. J. 2019; 26, 1339-49.
M Banti and W Bajo. Review on nutritional importance and anti-nutritional factors of legumes. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020; 9, 138-49.
G Das, A Sharma and PK Sarkar. Conventional and emerging processing techniques for the post-harvest reduction of antinutrients in edible legumes. Appl. Food Res. 2022; 2, 100112.
P Vadodariya, B Abuj, N Karmakar, N Gudadhe, P Faldu, A Narwade, D Chauhan, B Kaur and MK Debnath. Comparative biochemical study of different Lablab purpureus L. groups under processing. Legume Res. 2022; 45, 1362-71.
EA Shimelis and SK Rakshit. Effect of processing on antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in East Africa. Food Chem. 2007; 103, 161-72.
M Kumari and S Jain. Tannins: An antinutrient with positive effect to manage diabetes. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2012; 1, 70-3.
K Sharma, V Kumar, J Kaur, B Tanwar, A Goyal, R Sharma, Y Gat and A Kumar. Health effects, sources, utilization and safety of tannins: A critical review. Toxin Rev. 2021; 40, 432-44.
X Zhao, L Sun, X Zhang, M Wang, H Liu and Y Zhu. Nutritional components, volatile constituents and antioxidant activities of 6 chickpea species. Food Biosci. 2021; 41, 100964.
E Kimani, J Matasyoh, M Kinyua and FN Wachira. Characterisation of volatile compounds and flavour attributes of Lablab purpureus bean accessions. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2019; 18, 518-30.
BD Oomah, M Razafindrainibe and JCG Drover. Headspace volatile components of Canadian grown low‐tannin faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2014; 94, 473-81.
I Rajhi, B Baccouri, F Rajhi, H Mhadhbi and G Flamini. Monitoring the volatile compounds status of whole seeds and flours of legume cultivars. Food Biosci. 2021; 41, 101105.
P Khrisanapant, B Kebede, SY Leong and I Oey. A comprehensive characterisation of volatile and fatty acid profiles of legume seeds. Foods 2019; 8, 651.
H Jelen. Food flavors: Chemical, sensory, and technological properties. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2011, p. 65-93.
Z Ma, JI Boye, S Azarnia and BK Simpson. Volatile flavor profile of saskatchewan grown pulses as affected by different thermal processing treatments. Int. J. Food Properties 2016; 19, 2251-71.
A Karolkowski, E Guichard, L Brianda and C Salles. Volatile compounds in pulses: A review. Foods 2021; 10, 3140.
F Ferawati, C Witthöft and M Bergström. Characterization of volatile compounds in Swedish yellow and gray peas: Implications for new legume-based ingredients. Legume Sci. 2020; 2, e55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Walailak University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
