Identification of CRISPR/Cas12a (Cpf1) guideRNA Sequence Targeting the Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region in Wild Pig (Sus scrofa) Through Homology Difference and Mismatch Analysis

Authors

  • Muhammad Ihda Hamlu Liwaissunati Zein Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
  • Ari Hardianto Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
  • Irkham Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia
  • Yeni Wahyuni Hartati Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7603

Keywords:

Benchling, gRNA CRISPR/Cas12a, Biosensor, mtDNA D-loop, Wild pig (Sus scrofa), In silico

Abstract

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat) or CRISPR-associated (Cas) System has become a major gene editing tool. Gene editing with CRISPR requires the Cas protein and the corresponding guide RNA (gRNA). However, low cleavage efficiency and off-target effects can impede the application of the CRISPR/Cas system. Therefore, the determination of specific gRNAs is essential. In biosensor applications, CRISPR/Cas12a can enhance specificity and sensitivity in identifying target genes due to the trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a (Cpf1). The mtDNA D-loop sequence is the most variable part of mtDNA, making it suitable for distinguishing between species. Consequently, the objective of this study was to determine the gRNA sequence of the D-loop of wild pig mtDNA in silico. Candidate gRNAs were predicted using the Benchling application with the assistance of the GenBank database. The gRNA candidates were subsequently subjected to a homology difference analysis using BLAST nucleotide and a mismatch test using Jalview. Among several candidates, candidate 1 was selected as the best option, with an Off-target value of 99.8. The homology difference analysis against competitors and the mismatch test against the Sus genus resulted in high E-values and high percentage values, respectively. This suggests that the candidate will not recognize other species but can detect members of the Sus scrofa species. These gRNA candidates can be selectively and sensitively applied to biosensors for the detection of meat adulteration.

HIGHLIGHTS  

  • The D-loop exhibits high variability, make it useful for distinguishing between species
  • gRNA as an enabler of CRISPR/Cas12a to identify the target and initiate cleavage activity
  • The candidate 1 was selected with the sequence 5'-GAT TGT CGT GCC GGA TCA TGA GTT-3'
  • The application of this strategy is aimed at determining the halal status of food products
  • The application will encompass both quantitative and qualitative aspects

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

JA Doudna and E Charpentier. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014; 346, 1258096.

T Gaj, CA Gersbach and CF Barbas. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013; 31, 397-405.

PD Hsu, ES Lander and F Zhang. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 2014; 157, 1262-78.

JS Chen, E Ma, LB Harrington, MD Costa, X Tian, JM Palefsky and JA Doudna. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 2018; 360, 436-9.

SN Zakiyyah, AU Ibrahim, MS Babiker, S Gaffar, M Ozsoz, MIHL Zein and YW Hartati. Detection of tropical diseases caused by mosquitoes using CRISPR-Based biosensors. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022; 7, 309.

M Roccaro, C Bini, P Fais, G Merialdi, S Pelotti and A Peli. Who killed my dog? Use of forensic genetics to investigate an enigmatic case. Int. J. Legal Med. 2021; 135, 387-92.

YW Hartati, TA Setiawati, T Sofyatin, F Fitrilawati, A Anggraeni and S Gaffar. Electrochemical DNA biosensor for detection of pork (Sus scrofa) using screen printed carbon-reduced graphene oxide electrode. ScienceAsia 2020; 46, 72-9.

YW Hartati, AA Suryani, M Agustina, S Gaffar and A Anggraeni. A gold Nanoparticle–DNA Bioconjugate–Based electrochemical biosensor for detection of sus scrofa mtDNA in raw and processed meat. Food Anal. Meth. 2019; 12, 2591-600.

N Galtier, B Nabholz, S GlÉmin and GDD Hurst. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: A reappraisal. Mol. Ecol. 2009; 18, 4541-50.

R Allio, S Donega, N Galtier and B Nabholz. Large variation in the ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear mutation rate across animals: Implications for genetic diversity and the use of mitochondrial DNA as a molecular marker. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017; 34, 2762-72.

Q Yang, CMM Franco, SJ Sorokin and W Zhang. Development of a multilocus-based approach for sponge (phylum Porifera) identification: Refinement and limitations. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7, 41422.

HD Nguyen, TA Bui, PT Nguyen, OTP Kim and TTB Vo. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the indigenous i pig (Sus scrofa) in Vietnam. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017; 30, 930-7.

S Hermanto, T Rudiana, MIHL Zein and AW Wisudawati. Methods validation of pork authentication in processed meat products (Sausages) through densitometry analysis. Indonesian J. Halal Res. 2022; 4, 35-44.

YW Hartati, I Irkham, I Sumiati, S Wyantuti, S Gaffar, SN Zakiyyah, MIHL Zein and M Ozsoz. The optimization of a label-free electrochemical DNA biosensor for detection of sus scrofa mtDNA as food adulterations. Biosensors 2023; 13, 657.

TA Okuma and RS Hellberg. Identification of meat species in pet foods using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Food Contr. 2015; 50, 9-17.

AP Karlapudi, TC Venkateswarulu, J Tammineedi, K Srirama, L Kanumuri and VP Kodali. In silico sgRNA tool design for CRISPR control of quorum sensing in acinetobacter species. Gene. Dis. 2018; 5, 123-9.

A Sgro and P Blancafort. Epigenome engineering: New technologies for precision medicine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48, 12453-82.

L Hernandez-Huertas, G Kushawah, A Diaz-Moscoso, L Tomas-Gallardo, I Moreno-Sanchez, GDS Pescador, AA Bazzini and MA Moreno-Mateos. Optimized CRISPR-RfxCas13d system for RNA targeting in zebrafish embryos. STAR Protocol. 2022; 3, 101058.

R Torres-Ruiz and S Rodriguez-Perales. CRISPR-Cas9: A revolutionary tool for cancer modelling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015; 16, 22151-68.

P Mali, L Yang, KM Esvelt, J Aach, M Guell, JE DiCarlo, JE Norville and GM Church. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013; 339, 823-6.

Y Fu, JA Foden, C Khayter, ML Maeder, D Reyon, JK Joung and JD Sander. High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013; 31, 822-6.

CY Kharismasari, Irkham, MIHL Zein, A Hardianto, SN Zakiyyah, AU Ibrahim, M Ozsoz, and YW Hartati. CRISPR/Cas12-based electrochemical biosensors for clinical diagnostic and food monitoring. Bioelectrochemistry 2024; 155, 108600.

JG Doench, N Fusi, M Sullender, M Hegde, EW Vaimberg, KF Donovan, I Smith, Z Tothova, C Wilen, R Orchard, HW Virgin, J Listgarten and DE Root. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 Synthesis of an arrayed sgRNA library targeting the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016; 34, 184-91.

S Dash, S Rahman, H Hines and W Feng. Incremental BLAST: Incremental addition of new sequence databases through e-value correction. PLos One 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249410.

C Camacho, G Coulouris, V Avagyan, N Ma, J Papadopoulos, K Bealer and TL Madden. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10, 421.

Muflihah, A Hardianto, P Kusumaningtyas, S Prabowo and YW Hartati. DNA-based detection of pork content in food. Heliyon 2023; 9, e14418.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Zein, M. I. H. L., Hardianto, A., Irkham, I., & Hartati, Y. W. (2024). Identification of CRISPR/Cas12a (Cpf1) guideRNA Sequence Targeting the Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region in Wild Pig (Sus scrofa) Through Homology Difference and Mismatch Analysis. Trends in Sciences, 21(5), 7603. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7603