Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Umami Taste Derived from Proteolytic Hydrolysate of Pila ampullacea

Authors

  • Dedin Finatsiyatull Rosida Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
  • Teeradate Kongpichitchoke Department of Agro-Industry, Faculty of Biotechnology, Assumption University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
  • Phattara-Orn Havanapan Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya Campus, Nakhon Pathorn 73170, Thailand
  • Andre Yusuf Trisna Putra Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
  • Anugerah Dany Priyanto Innovation Center of Appropriate Food Technology for Lowland and Coastal Area, University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.6827

Keywords:

Umami peptides, Flavor enhancers, Pila ampullaceal, Hydrolysate, Proteases, LC-MS/MS, Sensory analysis

Abstract

In this study, umami taste was produced and identified from bromelain and trypsin hydrolysate of Pila ampullacea (PA). The PA hydrolysates, obtained from individually bromelain and trypsin with various Enzyme-to-Substrate ratio (E/S) of 1/10, 1/20, and 1/100 (w/v) using divers proteolysis times (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 h), were evaluated their chemical properties by degree of hydrolysis (DH), total peptide content, and amino acid content. Two chosen proteolysis conditions of PA hydrolysates were concluded by sensory evaluation using hedonic test and principal component analysis (PCA). PA hydrolysate using bromelain with E/S of 1:10 (w/v) for 18 h was one of the 2 chosen proteolysis conditions, which had DH value of 56.56 ± 1.65 %, total peptide content of 10.89 ± 0.09 mg/mL, and amino acid content of 95.34 ± 0.12 ppm. On the other hand, the chosen from trypsin digestion used E/S of 1:10 (w/v) for 15 h, which had DH value of 49.71 ± 0.22 %, total peptide content of 6.44 ± 0.28 mg/mL, and amino acid content of 81.43 ± 1.29 ppm. PA hydrolysates were subjected to explain the released peptides using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and database-assisted identification. There were many identified peptides contained in PA hydrolysates that contributed to umami taste. Their sequences from bromelain digestion were GPEGPQGPPGPRG, GIMLGAA, GLPGLPGLKGDPGEPGLP, GKDGEAG, GLVMDSCAGH, and EEKITEDDDAVGDDAENR. Several peptide fragments from trypsin digestion were GQTVIGL, GLPGLPGLSGPKG, DTGPAGPAGPAGPQGPR and QTLEKALSHVIQEFETEKQLITVNAR.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Umami taste derived from proteolytic hydrolysate of Pila ampullacea was firstly reported
  • The findings revealed that Pila ampullacea hydrolysates using bromelain with the Enzyme-to-Substrate ratio (E/S) 1:10 (w/v) for 18 h and trypsin with E/S of 1:10 (w/v) for 15 h had exhibited as the proficient treatment for hydrolysis conditions and selected based on sensory properties
  • This new method will be of considerable advantage to the best practice of umami taste establishment as flavor enhancer in the food manufacture


GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

K Kurihara. Umami the fifth basic taste: history of studies on receptor mechanism and role as a food flavor. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015; 2015, 189402.

F Bellisle. Experimental studies of food choices and palatability responses in European subjects exposed to the Umami taste. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008; 17, 376-9.

Y Dang, X Gao, A Xie, X Wu and F Ma. Interaction between umami peptide and taste receptor T1R1/T1R3. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2014; 70, 1841-8.

H Liu, LT Da and Y Liu. Understanding the molecular mechanism of umami recognition by T1R1-T1R3 using molecular dynamics simulations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2019; 514, 967-73.

DM Kendig, NR Hurst, ZL Bradley, S Mahavadi, JF Kuenmerle, V Lyall, J DeSimone, KS Murthy and JR Grider. Activation of the umami taste receptor (T1R1/T1R3) initiates the peristaltic reflex and pellet propulsion in the distal colon. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2014; 307, G1100-G1107.

S Jinap and P Hajeb. Glutamate. Its application in food and contribution to health. Appetite 2010; 55, 1-10.

K Ninomiya. Science of umami taste: Adaptation to gastronomic culture. Flavour 2015; 4, 13

V Husarova and D Ostatnikova. Monosodium glutamate toxic effects and their implications for human intake: A review. JMED Res. 2013; 2013, 608765.

K Niaz, E Zaplatic and J Spoor. Extensive use of monosodium glutamate: A threat to public health. EXCLI J. 2018; 17, 273-8.

SF Brun, TG Kudre and N Bhaskar. Effects of different pretreatments and proteases on recovery, umami taste compound contents and antioxidant potentials of Labeo rohita head protein hydrolysates. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2019; 56, 1966-77.

X Xu, R Xu, Z Song, Q Jia, T Feng, M Huang and S Song. Identification of umami-tasting peptides from Volvariella volvacea using ultra performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and sensory-guided separation techniques. J. Chrom. A 2019; 1596, 96-103.

J Gao, D Fang, BM Kimatu, X Chen, X Wu, J Du, Q Yang, H Chen, H Zheng, X An, L Zhao and Q Hu. Analysis of umami taste substances of morel mushroom (Morchella sextelata) hydrolysates derived from different enzymatic systems. Food Chem. 2021; 362, 130192.

MR Rhyu, AY Song, EY Kim, HJ Son, Y Kim, S Mummalaneni, J Qian, JR Grider and V Lyall. Kokumi taste active peptides modulate salt and umami taste. Nutrients 2020; 12, 1198.

MX Zhang, ZC Wang, Y Liu, XL Xu and GH Zhou. Isolation and identification of flavour peptides from Puffer fish (Takifugu obscurus). Food Chem. 2012; 135, 1463-70.

Z Liu, Y Zhu, W Wang, X Zhou, G Chen and Y Liu. Seven novel umami peptides from Takifu rubripes and their taste characteristics. Food Chem. 2020; 330, 127204.

M Chen, X Gao, D Pan, S Xu, H Zhang, Y Sun, J He and Y Dang. Taste characteristics and umami mechanism of novel umami peptides and umami-enhancing peptides isolated from the hydrolysates of Sanhuang Chicken. Eur. Food Res. Tech. 2021; 247, 1633-44.

X Bao, S Ma, Y Fu, J Wu and M Zhang. Sensory and structural characterization of umami peptides derived from sunflower seed. CyTA J. Food 2020; 18, 485-92.

Y Ding, X Li and J Kan. Isolation and identification of flavor peptides from douche (traditional Chinese soybean food). Int. J. Food Properties 2017; 20, 1982-94.

MNG Amin, J Kusnadi, JL Hsu, RJ Doerksen and TC Huang. Identification of a novel umami peptide in tempeh (Indonesian fermented soybean) and its binding mechanism to the umami receptor T1R. Food Chem. 2020; 333, 127411.

GK Beauchamp. Sensory and receptor responses to umami: an overview of pioneering work. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009; 90, 723S-727S.

JFLD Pablo, E Badal, CF García, AM Ortí and AS Serra. Land snails as a diet diversification proxy during the early upper palaeolithic in Europe. PLoS One 2014; 9, e104898.

S Ghosh, C Jung and VBM Rochow. Snail as mini-livestock: nutritional potential of farmed Pomacea canaliculata (Ampullariidae). Agr. Nat. Resource 2017; 51, 504-11.

RM Marwoto, H Heryanto and RC Joshi. The invasive apple snail Pomacea canaliculata in Indonesia: a case study in Lake Rawa Pening, Central Java. BIO Web Conf. 2020; 19, 00014.

R Broto, F Arifan, WA Setyati, K Eldiarosa and AR Zein. Crackers from fresh water snail (Pila ampullaceal) waste as alternative nutritious food. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020; 448, 012039.

K Ihsani, DN Afifah, DT Anantyo, Mulyono, TW Nugroho, F Wahyudi and Nuryanto. Nutrient content and shelf life analysis of freshwater snail (Pila ampullaceal) instant baby porridge. Food Res. 2020; 4, 184-96.

DF Rosida, AD Priyanto and AYT Putra. Effects of papain concentration and hydrolysis time on degree of hydrolysis and glutamic acid content of apple snail hydrolysate. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar of Research Month, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. 2021, p. 17-21.

AYT Putra, DF Rosida and AD Priyanto. Effect of hydrolysis time and papain concentration on some properties of apple snail (Pila ampullaceal) hydrolysate. Int. J. Eco Innovat. Sci. Eng. 2020; 1, 1-5.

P Thiviya, A Gamage, NS Gama-Arachchige, O Merah and T Madhujith. Seaweeds as a source of functional proteins. Phycology 2022; 2, 216-43.

VM Silva and M Hubinger. Production and shelf life of mussel meat powder flavor. In: S Haugen and S Meijer (Eds.). Handbook of nutritional biochemistry: Genomics. Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2009.

DL Swaney, CD Wenger and JJ Coon. The value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010; 9, 1323-9.

R Mohan, V Sivakumar, T Rangasamy and C Muralidharan. Optimisation of bromelain enzyme extraction from pineapple (Ananas comosus) and application in process industry. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016; 12, 188-95.

NT Hoyle and JH Merrit. Quality of fish protein hydrolysate from Herring (Clupea harengus). J. Food Sci. 1994; 59, 76-9.

OH Lowry, NJ Rosebrough, AL Farr and RJ Randall. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951; 193, 265-75.

EF Hartree. Determination of protein: A modification of the lowry method that gives a linear photometric response. Anal. Biochem. 1972; 48, 422-7.

M Ledoux and F Lamy. Determination of proteins and sulfobetaine with the folin-phenol reagent. Anal. Biochem. 1986; 157, 28-31.

S Moore and WH Stein. Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. J. Biol. Chem. 1948; 176, 367-88.

S Yamaguchim and C Takahashi. Hedonic functions of monosodium glutamate and four basic taste substances used at various concentration levels in single and complex systems. Agr. Biol. Chem. 1984; 48, 1077-81.

Y Witono, RR Fauziah, WS Windrati, I Taruna, L Azkiyah and RP Wijayanti. Formulation of flavor enhancer from common barb (Rasbora jacobsoni) protein hydrolysate. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019; 2199, 060002.

MAK Anuar, NHH Narashid, MM Salleh and A Yahya. Conversion of chicken viscera into protein hydrolysate for palatant production. Malays. J. Fund. Appl. Sci. 2017; 13, 606-11.

L You, JM Regenstein and RH Liu. Optimization of hydrolysis conditions for the production of antioxidant peptides from fish gelatin using response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. 2010; 75, C582-C587.

RB Benítez, WFE Tabares, LAL Veláquez, CIH Sánchez and OAS Cruel. Enzymatic hydrolysis as a tool to improve total digestibility and techno-functional properties of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) starch. Heliyon 2021; 7, e07817.

L Wang, B Xu, L Li, M Zhang, T Feng, J Wang and Z Jin. Enhancement of umami taste of hydrolyzed protein from wheat gluten by β-cyclodextrin. J. Sci. Food. Agr. 2016; 96, 4499-504.

T Kaur, A Kaur and RK Grewal. Kinetics studies with fruit bromelain (Ananas comosus) in the presence of cysteine and divalent ions. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2015; 52, 5954-60.

R Huber and W Bode. Structural basis of the activation and action of trypsin. Accounts Chem. Res. 1978; 11, 114-22.

R Ghanbari, M Zarei, A Ebrahimpour, AA Hamid, A Ismail and N Saari. Angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory and anti-oxidant activities of sea cucumber (Actinopyga lecanora) hydrolysates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015; 16, 28870-85.

A Panchaud, M Affolter and M Kussmann. Mass spectrometry for nutritional peptidomics: How to analyze food bioactives and their health effects. J. Proteomics 2012; 75, 3546-59.

T Ugawa, S Konosu and K Kurihara. Enhancing effects of NaCl and Na phosphate on human gustatory responses to amino acids. Chem. Senses 1992; 17, 811-5.

E Karangwa, N Murekatete, JD Habimana, K Masamba, E Duhoranimana, B muhoza and X Zhang. Contribution of crosslinking products in the flavour enhancer processing: The new concept of maillard peptide in sensory characteristics of maillard reaction systems. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2016; 53, 2863-75.

A Kuninaka. Studies on taste of ribonucleic acid derivatives. J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1960; 34, 489-92.

M Kawai, A Okiyama and Y Ueda. Taste enhancements between various amino acids and IMP. Chem. Senses 2002; 27, 739-45.

C Sonklin, N Laohakunjit and O Kerdchoechuen. Physicochemical and flavor characteristics of flavoring agent from mungbean protein hydrolyzed by bromelain. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2011; 59, 8475-83.

S Arai, M Yamashita and M Fujimaki. Glutamyl oligopeptides as factors responsible for tastes of a proteinase-modified soybean protein. Agr. Biol. Chem. 1972; 36, 1253-6.

T Matoba, R Hayashi and T Hata. Isolation of bitter peptides from tryptic hydrolysate of casein and their chemical structure. Agr. Biol. Chem. 1970; 34, 1235-43.

YL Dang, ZI Zhang, XW Yan, Z Wang and SY Xu. Isolation, purification and structural identification of flavor peptides from enzymolyzed parma ham. Food Sci. 2010; 31, 127-31.

JÁ Gómez-Ruiz, G Taborda, L Amigo, M Ramos and E Molina. Sensory and mass spectrometric analysis of the peptidic fraction lower than one thousand daltons in manchego cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2007; 90, 4966-73.

JN Park, K Ishida, T Watanabe, KI Endoh, K Watanabe, M Murakami and H Abe. Taste effects of oligopeptides in a Vietnamese fish sauce. Fisheries Sci. 2002; 68, 921-8.

J Zhang, D Sun-Waterhouse, G Su and M Zhao. New insight into umami receptor, umami/umami-enhancing peptides and their derivatives: A review. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2019; 88, 429-38.

C Salles, C Septier, F Roudit-Algaron, A Guillot and PX Etievant. Sensory and chemical analysis of fractions obtained by gel permeation of water coluble comte cheese extracts. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1995; 43, 1659-68.

Y Dang, X Gao, F Ma and X Wu. Comparison of umami taste peptides in water soluble extractions of Jinhua and Parma hams. LWT Food Sci. Tech. 2015; 60, 1179-86.

HN Lioe, K Takara and M Yasuda. Evaluation of peptide contribution to the intense umami taste of Japanese soy sauces. J. Food Sci. 2006; 71, S277-S283.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-10

How to Cite

Rosida, D. F. ., Kongpichitchoke, T. ., Havanapan, P.-O. ., Putra, A. Y. T. ., & Priyanto, A. D. . (2023). Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Umami Taste Derived from Proteolytic Hydrolysate of Pila ampullacea. Trends in Sciences, 21(1), 6827. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.6827