Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers of Phytoplankton Composition in a Tropical Dam Over 5 Years in Chiang Mai, Thailand

Authors

  • Tatporn Kunpradid Department of Biology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand
  • Phitsanuphakhin Chaimongkhon Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity Research and Implementation for Community, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand
  • Rungnapa Tagun Department of Biology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7930

Keywords:

Mae Kaung Dam, Phytoplankton dynamics, Tropical dam, Long-term monitoring, Community structure, Staurastrum

Abstract

This 5-year study (2015 - 2019) investigates the dynamics of phytoplankton and their correlation with environmental factors including water volume, physicochemical and nutrient availability in Mae Kuang Dam, Northern Thailand. The study identified 177 taxa across 6 groups, with Charophyta being predominant (53.3 %) in both wet and dry seasons, specifically in the genus Staurastrum. Taxonomic richness was higher in the wet season, with green algae being the most abundant. In addition, Cyanobacteria, Bacillariophyceae and Chrysophyceae showed increased densities. Annual variations peaked in 2015, decreased in 2017 and exhibited a slight increase thereafter. Cyanobacteria experienced blooms in the wet season, accompanied by significant fluctuations in Charophyta, Cyanophyta, Dinophyta and Euglenophyta. Notably, Cyanophyta exhibited a 20-fold increase from 2015 to 2019. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) highlighted the influence of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), conductivity, air temperature, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) on phytoplankton during the dry season. Lower water volumes and concentrations of water bodies may intensify the impact of certain factors on phytoplankton communities during this period. In the wet season, pH, conductivity, TDS, ammonia, air temperature and BOD played significant roles, as increased rainfall and nutrient runoff occurred. These results indicate that the combined effects of these environmental variables and hydrological events, including water volume and water static, could influence the dynamics of phytoplankton and water quality. This finding helps us understand the shifts in the aquatic ecosystem under the environmental factors in Thailand. Therefore, further research is needed, emphasizing the necessity for well-planned dam management to maintain both water quality and ecological stability.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Biannual monitoring was conducted over 5 years to study the dynamics of phytoplankton in a tropical dam. Green algae, including Staurastrum and Cosmarium, dominated throughout the sampling period
  • Green algae showed a decreasing trend in cell numbers, while Cyanophyta exhibited an increasing trend
  • The low water volumes of water bodies may favor green algae, while the highest volume favors high nutrient levels, resulting in more cell numbers than in the dry season. Therefore, nutrient variability, temperature and water volume may favor the dominating growth of green algae and Cyanobacteria

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

SA Henson, BB Cael, SR Allen and S Dutkiewicz. Future phytoplankton diversity in a changing climate. Nat. Comm. 2021; 12, 5372.

J Sha, H Xiong, C Li, Z Lu, J Zhang, H Zhong, W Zhang and B Yan. Harmful algal blooms and their eco-environmental indication. Chemosphere 2021; 274, 129912.

JC Ho, AM Michalak and N Pahlevan. Widespread global increase in intense lake phytoplankton blooms since the 1980s. Nature 2019; 574, 667-70.

BR Sim, HC Kim, CS Kim, JH Kim, KW Park, WA Lim and WC Lee. Seasonal distributions of phytoplankton and environmental factors generate algal blooms in the Taehwa River, South Korea. Water 2020; 12, 3329.

J Hu, L Hua, A You, L Chen, Z Xu, Z Wang, W Zhang, C Zhang, G Yu and W Tang. Taxon-specific effects of seasonal variation and water connectivity on the diversity of phytoplankton, zooplankton and benthic organisms in urban wetland. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 2023; 38, 2253265.

JAD Cavalho, L Rönn, TC Prins and H Hillebrand. Temporal change in phytoplankton diversity and functional group composition. Mar. Biodiversity 2023; 53, 72.

F Buzzi. Phytoplankton assemblages in two sub-basins of Lake Como. J. Limnol. 2002; 61, 117-28.

J Sirunda, P Oberholster, G Wolfaardt, M Botes and C Truter. The assessment of phytoplankton dynamics in two reservoirs in Southern Africa with special reference to water abstraction for inter-basin transfers and potable water production. Water 2021; 13, 3045.

RE Lee. Phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018.

W Zhu, Z Ding, Y Pan and Q Wang. Using an affinity analysis to identify phytoplankton associations. Ecol. Evol. 2022; 12, e9047.

AD Eaton, LS Clesceri, EW Rice and AE Greenberg. Standard method for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association Press, Washington DC, 2002.

Y Cai, L Qi, T Shan, Y Liu, N Zhang, X Lu and Y Fan. Application of phytoplankton taxonomic α-diversity indices to assess trophic states in barrier lake: A case of Jingpo Lake. Diversity 2022; 14, 1003.

K Noguchi, RS Abel, F Marmolejo-Ramos and F Konietschke. Nonparametric multiple comparisons. Behav. Res. Meth. 2020; 52, 489-502.

R Tagun, B Wongtui and T Kunpradid. The response of aquatic insect assemblages to diverse land-use types and environmental factors in Mae Ram River basin, Thailand. ScienceAsia 2023; 49, 297.

N O’Rourke and L Hatcher. A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, North Carolina, 2013.

H Shen, L Ye, Q Cai and L Tan. Longitudinal variations in physiochemical conditions and their consequent effect on phytoplankton functional diversity within a subtropical system of cascade reservoirs. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022; 10, 914623.

MRA Costa, MML Cardoso, GB Selmeczy, J Padisák and V Becker. Phytoplankton functional responses induced by extreme hydrological events in a tropical reservoir. Hydrobiologia 2024; 851, 849-67.

R Li, QJ Xu, GS Zhang, XY Cheng and B Sai. Effects of various total dissolved solids (TDS) on the growth of phytoplankton. Res. Environ. Sci. 2013; 26, 1072-8.

TY Ling, N Gerunsin, CL Soo, L Nyanti, SF Sim and J Grinang. Seasonal changes and spatial variation in water quality of a large young tropical reservoir and its downstream river. J. Chem. 2017; 2017, 8153246.

RS Lakshmi, S Prakash, AA Lotliker, SK Baliarsingh, A Samanta, T Mathew, A Chatterjee, BK Sahu and TMB Nair. Physicochemical controls on the initiation of phytoplankton bloom during the winter monsoon in the Arabian Sea. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11, 13448.

D Li, F Chang, X Wen, L Duan and H Zhang. Seasonal variations in water quality and algal blooming in hypereutrophic Lake Qilu of southwestern China. Water 2022; 14, 2611.

HW Paerl and J Huisman. Climate change: A catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009; 1, 27-37.

E Marañón, MP Lorenzo, P Cermeño and B Mouriño-Carballido. Nutrient limitation suppresses the temperature dependence of phytoplankton metabolic rates. ISME J. 2018; 12, 1836-45.

M Poniewozik and T Lenard. Phytoplankton composition and ecological status of lakes with cyanobacteria dominance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 2022; 19, 3832.

K Zhao, L Wang, Q You, Y Pan, T Liu, Y Zhou, J Zhang, W Pang and Q Wang. Influence of cyanobacterial blooms and environmental variation on zooplankton and eukaryotic phytoplankton in a large, shallow, eutrophic lake in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021; 773, 145421.

C Meesukko, N Gajaseni, Y Peerapornpisal and A Voinov. Relationships between seasonal variation and phytoplankton dynamics in Kaeng Krachan reservoir, Phetchaburi province. Nat. Hist. J. Chulalongkorn Univ. 2007; 7, 131-43.

K Shetty and K Gulimane. Biomonitoring of freshwater lentic habitats using desmids. Limnology 2022; 23, 245-51.

DS Domozych, ZA Popper and I Sorensen. Charophytes: Evolutionary giants and emerging model organisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2016; 7, 1470.

A García. Charophyta: Their use in paleolimnology. J. Paleolimnol. 1994; 10, 43-52.

J Umen. Green algae and the origins of multicellularity in the plant kingdom. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2014; 6, a016170.

J Li, X Xiao, X Xian, S Li, X Yu and X Zhang. Green algae outcompete cyanobacteria in a shallow lake, Longhu Lake. Water Supply 2023; 23, 2649-61.

E Litchman, PDT Pinto, KF Edwards, CA Klausmeier, CT Kremer and MK Thomas. Global biogeochemical impacts of phytoplankton: A trait-based perspective. J. Ecol. 2015; 103, 1384-96.

T Lenard, W Ejankowski and M Poniewozik. Responses of phytoplankton communities in selected eutrophic lakes to variable weather conditions. Water 2019; 11, 1207.

C Yang, J Nan and J Li. Driving factors and dynamics of phytoplankton community and functional groups in an estuary reservoir in the Yangtze River, China. Water 2019; 11, 1184.

Y Liu, C Li, S Jian, S Miao, K Li, H Guan, Y Mao, Z Wang and C Li. Hydrodynamics regulate longitudinal plankton community structure in an alpine cascade reservoir system. Front. Microbiol. 2021; 12, 749888.

B Taş. Trophic state assessment based on summer phytoplankton community structure and trophic indices: A small tectonic lake in Turkey. Desalination Water Treat. 2021; 214, 390-401.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Kunpradid, T. ., Chaimongkhon, P. ., & Tagun, R. . (2024). Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers of Phytoplankton Composition in a Tropical Dam Over 5 Years in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Trends in Sciences, 21(8), 7930. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7930