EEG neural substrates of cognitive engagements for research-based learning with contemplative education in the young child

Authors

  • Dania Cheaha Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
  • Nurulhuda Basor Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
  • Ekkasit Kumarnsit Division of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
  • Pairoj Kirirat Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
  • Mitchai Chongcheawchamnan Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
  • Nifareeda Samerphob Division of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7679

Keywords:

Contemplative education, EEG, Research-based learning, Young children, Cognitive development

Abstract

One becomes aware of the evidence of cognitive insights following attending the research-based learning program with contemplative education, electroencephalography (EEG), and electrodermal activity (EDA) were used to track the improvement of emotional and cognitive states. Research-based learning (RBL) and teaching models were developed to enhance research characteristics and cognitive training for children in the 21st century. To date, there have been no reliable cognitive tools to monitor the cognitive insight of the child who attends the course. The EEG, EDA, and cognitive scores of thirty healthy students participating in a research-based program for an hour per week were evaluated prior to the course, 3 months, and 6 months after the program started. The cognitive tests included a standard progressive matric (SPM) test, arithmetic test, Eriksen flanker task, and biofeedback sessions. The same procedures were determined in the comparative students’ group. After six months of taking the program, students in the RBL group showed a significant improvement in their SPM and arithmetic test scores. A significant increase in beta and gamma activity was detected in the temporal cortex of the RBL group during the SPM test. A more significant enhancement of frontal theta power was observed during the arithmetic test. This study shows that contemplative education and research-based learning improve cognitive abilities, indicating a significant increase in EEG quantity for cognitive engagement and the ability to confer individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

W Rattanaprom. Failure of research-based learning implementation in basic education. Int. Educ. Stud. 2019; 12, 19-23.

D Chongcharoen and P Weerpiput. The effects of learning management using contemplative education, coaching system and research-based learning process to competency development of students in early childhood education program. Turk. Online J. Qual. Inq. 2021; 12, 10775-86.

J Noonchart. The research and development of teacher production and training system on teaching biology through contemplative education coaching & mentoring system and research-based learning. Solid State Tech. 2021; 64, 5748-58.

L Newman. Bodies of knowledge: Historians, health and education. Hist. Educ. 2023; 52, 479-94.

RK Sari, A Sutiadiningsih, H Zaini, F Meisarah and AA Hubur. Factors affecting cognitive intelligence theory. J. Crit. Rev. 2020; 7, 402-10.

IFVD Bos, EH Kroesbergen, JEV Luit, I Xenidou-Dervou, LM Jonkman, MVD Schoot and ECDMV Lieshout. Longitudinal development of number line estimation and mathematics performance in primary school children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2015; 134, 12-29.

T Kautz, JJ Heckman, R Diris, BT Weel and L Borghans. Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success. OECD Educ. Work. Paper. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxsr7vr78f7-en.

R Colom, S Karama, RE Jung and RJ Haier. Human intelligence and brain networks. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2010; 12, 489-501.

CM Tyng, HU Amin, MNM Saad and AS Malik. The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Front. Psychol. 2017; 8, 1454.

SR Cox, SJ Ritchie, C Fawns-Ritchie, EM Tucker-Drob and IJ Deary. Structural brain imaging correlates of general intelligence in UK Biobank. Intelligence 2019; 76, 101376.

F Zhou, C Montag, R Sariyska, B Lachmann, M Reuter, B Weber, P Trautner, KM Kendrick, S Markett and B Becker. Orbitofrontal gray matter deficits as marker of Internet gaming disorder: Converging evidence from a cross‐sectional and prospective longitudinal design. Addiction Biol. 2019; 24, 100-9.

OE Krigolson, CC Williams, A Norton, CD Hassall and FL Colino. Choosing MUSE: Validation of a low-cost, portable EEG system for ERP research. Front. Neurosci. 2017; 11, 109.

E Ratti, S Waninger, C Berka, G Ruffini and A Verma. Comparison of medical and consumer wireless EEG systems for use in clinical trials. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017; 11, 398.

IJ Deary, S Strand, P Smith and C Fernandes. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence 2007; 35, 13-21.

LA Verbitskaya, YP Zinchenko, SB Malykh, IV Gaidamashko, OA Kalmyk and TN Tikhomirova. Cognitive predictors of success in learning Russian among native speakers of high school age in different educational systems. Psychol. Russia State Art 2020; 13, 2-15.

T Tikhomirova, A Malykh and S Malykh. Predicting academic achievement with cognitive abilities: Cross-sectional study across school education. Behav. Sci. 2020; 10, 158.

LA Verbitskaya, S Malykh and T Tikhomirova. Cognitive predictors of success in learning Russian in native and non-native speakers at high school age. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2017; 237, 1236-41.

D Luo, LA Thompson and DK Detterman. The criterion validity of tasks of basic cognitive processes. Intelligence 2006; 34, 79-120.

M Rodic, X Zhou, T Tikhomirova, W Wei, S Malykh, V Ismatulina, E Sabirova, Y Davidova, MG Tosto, JP Lemelin and Y Kovas. Cross-cultural investigation into cognitive underpinnings of individual differences in early arithmetic. Dev. Sci. 2015; 18, 165-74.

T Tikhomirova, Y Kuzmina, I Lysenkova and S Malykh. Development of approximate number sense across the elementary school years: A cross‐cultural longitudinal study. Dev Sci. 2019; 22, e12823.

K Laidra, H Pullmann and J Allik. Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 2007; 42, 441-51.

LA Brown, JR Brockmole, AJ Gow and IJ Deary. Processing speed and visuospatial executive function predict visual working memory ability in older adults. Exp. Aging Res. 2012; 38, 1-19.

T Tikhomirova. Spatial thinking and memory in Russian high school students with different levels of mathematical fluency. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2017; 237, 1260-4.

R Bull, KA Espy and SA Wiebe. Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2008; 33, 205-28.

SVD Sluis, AVD Leij and PFD Jong. Working memory in Dutch children with reading-and arithmetic-related LD. J. Learn. Disabil. 2005; 38, 207-21.

W Yang, P Liu, D Wei, W Li, G Hitchman, X Li, J Qiu and Q Zhang. Females and males rely on different cortical regions in raven’s matrices reasoning capacity: Evidence from a voxel-based morphometry study. PLos One 2014; 9, e93104.

V Wespatat, F Tennigkeit and W Singer. Phase sensitivity of synaptic modifications in oscillating cells of rat visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004; 24, 9067-75.

S Issa, Q Peng and X You. Emotion classification using EEG brain signals and the broad learning system. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2020; 51, 7382-91.

C Liu, T Han, Z Xu, J Liu, M Zhang, J Du, Q Zhou, Y Duan, Y Li, J Wang, D Cui and Y Wang. Modulating gamma oscillations promotes brain connectivity to improve cognitive impairment. Cerebr. Cortex 2022; 32, 2644-56.

M Roohi-Azizi, L Azimi, S Heysieattalab and M Aamidfar. Changes of the brain’s bioelectrical activity in cognition, consciousness, and some mental disorders. Med. J. Islam. Republic Iran 2017; 31, 53.

C Sestieri, GL Shulman and M Corbetta. The contribution of the human posterior parietal cortex to episodic memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017; 18, 183-92.

MD Fox, RL Buckner, H Liu, MM Chakravarty, AM Lozano and A Pascual-Leone. Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014; 111, E4367-E4375.

A Das, CDL Angeles and V Menon. Electrophysiological foundations of the human default-mode network revealed by intracranial-EEG recordings during resting-state and cognition. NeuroImage 2022; 250, 118927.

TN Tikhomirova, SB Malykh, MG Tosto and Y Kovas. Cognitive characteristics and mathematical achievement in high school students: Cross-cultural analyses. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal 2014; 35, 41-53.

V Menon. Developmental cognitive neuroscience of arithmetic: Implications for learning and education. ZDM 2010; 42, 515-25.

S Chattopadhyay. An interactive model of relevance, cognitive load, spatial memory, ADHD, and EEG, Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/smwka, accessed May 2023.

K Katahira, Y Yamazaki, C Yamaoka, H Ozaki, S Nakagawa and N Nagata. EEG correlates of the flow state: A combination of increased frontal theta and moderate frontocentral alpha rhythm in the mental arithmetic task. Front. Psychol. 2018; 9, 300.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-20

How to Cite

Cheaha, D. ., Basor, N. ., Kumarnsit, E. ., Kirirat, P. ., Chongcheawchamnan, M. ., & Samerphob, N. . (2024). EEG neural substrates of cognitive engagements for research-based learning with contemplative education in the young child . Trends in Sciences, 21(6), 7679. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.7679