Bio-Inspired Computing-A Dive into Critical Problems, Potential Architecture and Techniques

Authors

  • Ajay Sudhir Bale Department of ECE, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, India
  • Subhashish Tiwari Department of ECE, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi, Guntur 522213, India
  • Aditya Khatokar Department of ECE, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, India
  • Vinay N Department of ECE, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, India
  • Kiran Mohan M S Department of CSE, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2021.703

Keywords:

Silicon neuromorphic photonic processors, SBO, Nanomaterials, Drug delivery, Efficiency, Optimization

Abstract

The integration and development of electronics in the recent years have impacted a major development on the world and humans, one among that is nanotechnology. Nanotechnology has achieved a greater progress in biomedical engineering in diagnosis and treatment, leading to the introduction of nanomaterials for drug delivery, prostheses and implanting. This work describes the Bio-Nano-tools that are developed based on iron oxide properties, automated tools used in the tumor detection, satin bowerbird optimization (SBO) technique employed in diagnosis of skin cancer. This work also highlights the post introduction development of nanomaterials like combination of nanotechnology with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact, advancement of nanomaterials based on their operations, shapes and characteristics that leading to the growth of nanostructures with operations control properties. The paper also highlights the improvement of silicon neuromorphic photonic processors and parallel simulators in the development of bio inspired computing. We are hopeful that this review article provides future directions in Bio-Inspired Computing.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • In processing of medical images, noise plays a challenging role. So, reduction of noise is important, with the data that is analyzed in our review, it is shown that noise reduction can be achieved using Gradient and Feature Adaptive Contour (GFAC) model, with effective results
  • There are many algorithms that are used for skin cancer detection, as highlighted in our review. Amongst all the methods, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm shows impressive results when compared to other models in terms of feature extraction in dermoscopy images
  • Satin bowerbird optimization (SBO) algorithm helps in improving the CNN efficiency. The optimal justification of the hyper parameter numbers in convolutional neural network (CNN) for skin cancer diagnosis can be achieved using an SBO algorithm

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

W Zhang, B Gao, J Tang, P Yao, S Yu, MF Chang, HJ Yoo, H Qian and H Wu. Neuro-inspired computing chips. Nat. Electron. 2020; 3, 371-82.

L Calvet, JD Armas, D Masip and AA Juan. Learnheuristics: Hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs. Open Math. 2017; 15, 261-80.

I Boussaid, J Lepagnot and P Siarry. A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inf. Sci. 2013; 237, 82-117.

M Dorigo. 1992, Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Dissertation. Politecnico di Milano, Italy.

JD Farmer, NH Packard and AS Perelson. The immune system, adaptation, and machine learning, Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 1986; 22,187-204.

JH Holland. Outline for a logical theory of adaptive systems. J. ACM 1962; 9, 297-314.

TA Feo and MGC Resende. A probabilistic heuristic for a computationally difficult set covering problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 1989; 8, 67-71.

O Martin, SW Otto and EW Felten. Large-step markov chains for the TSP incorporating local search heuristics. Oper. Res. Lett. 1992; 11, 219-24.

J Kennedy and RC Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia. 1995, p. 1942-8.

F Glover. Heuristics for integer programming using surrogate constraints. Decis. Sci. 1977; 8, 156-66.

S Kirkpatrick. Optimization by simulated annealing: Quantitative studies. J. Stat. phys. 1984; 34, 975-86.

F Glover. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Comput. Oper. Res. 1986; 13, 533-49.

N Mladenovic. A variable neighborhood algorithm: A new metaheuristic for combinatorial optimization. Presented at Optimization Days, Montreal, 1995, p. 112.

VS Saji, HC Choe and KWK Young. Nanotechnology in biomedical applications-a review. Int. J. Nano Biomater. 2010; 3, 119-39.

AK Gupta, RR Naregalkar, VD Vaidya and M Gupta. Recent advances on surface engineering of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Nanomedicine 2007; 2, 23-39.

B Kasemo. Biological surface science. Surf. Sci. 2002; 500, 656-77.

AH Faraji and P Wipf. Nanoparticles in cellular drug delivery. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009; 17, 2950-62.

LE McNamara, RJ McMurray, MJP Biggs, F Kantawong, ROC Oreffo and MJ Dalby. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J Tissue Eng. 2010; 2010, 120623.

EKF Yim, EM Darling, K Kulangara, F Guilak and KW Leong. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2010; 31, 1299-306.

DG Castner and BD Ratner. Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers. Surf. Sci. 2002; 500, 28-60.

DF Moyano and VM Rotello. Nano meets biology: Structure and function at the nanoparticle interface. Langmuir 2011; 27, 10376-85.

KL Menzies and L Jones. The impact of contact angle on the biocompatibility of biomaterials. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2010; 87, 387-99.

J Oh, MD Feldman, J Kim, C Condit, S Emelianov and TE Milner. Detection of magnetic nanoparticles in tissue using magneto-motive ultrasound. Nanotechnology 2006; 17, 4183-90.

AK Gupta and M Gupta. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2005; 26, 3995-4021.

H Meng, Z Chen, G Xing, H Yuan, C Chen, F Zhao, C Zhang and Y Zhao. Ultrahigh reactivity provokes nanotoxicity: Explanation of oral toxicity of nano-copper particles. Toxicol. Lett. 2007; 175, 102-10.

K Donaldson and A Seaton. The Janus faces of nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007; 7, 4607-11.

S Andreescu, M Ornatska, JS Erlichman, A Estevez and JC Leiter. Biomedical applications of metal oxide nanoparticles. In: E Matijevic (Ed.). Fine particles in medicine and pharmacy. Springer, Boston, MA, 2012.

CT Campbell and CHF Peden. Oxygen vacancies and catalysis on ceria surfaces. Science 2005; 309, 713-4.

AH Faraji and P Wipf. Nanoparticles in cellular drug delivery. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009; 17, 2950-62.

HT Song, JS Choi, YM Huh, S Kim, YW Jun, JS Suh and J Cheon. Surface modulation of magnetic nanocrystals in the development of highly efficient magnetic resonance probes for intracellular labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127, 9992-3.

NL Rosi and CA Mirkin. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem. Rev. 2005; 105, 1547-62.

Z Xu, FR Sheykhahmad, N Ghadimi and N Razmjooy. Computer-aided diagnosis of skin cancer based on soft computing techniques. Open Med. 2020; 15, 860-71.

P Moallem and N Razmjooy. A multi layer perceptron neural network trained by invasive weed optimization for potato color image segmentation. Trends Appl. Sci. Res. 2012; 7, 445-55.

H Leng, X Li, J Zhu, H Tang, Z Zhang and N Ghadimi. A new wind power prediction method based on ridgelet transforms, hybrid feature selection and closed-loop forecasting. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2018; 36, 20-30.

A Hekler, JS Utikal, AH Enk, A Hauschild, M Weichenthal, RC Maron, C Berking, S Haferkamp, J Klode, D Schadendorf, B Schilling, T Holland-Letz, B Izar, CV Kalle, S Frohling and TJ Brinker. Superior skin cancer classification by the combination of human and artificial intelligence. Eur. J. Cancer 2019; 120, 114-21.

D Anoraganingrum. Cell segmentation with median filter and mathematical morphology operation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Venice, Italy. 1999, p. 1043-6.

T Loupas, WN McDicken and PL Allan. An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 1989; 36, 129-35.

E Emary, HM Zawbaa and C Grosan. Experienced gray wolfoptimization through reinforcement learning and neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2018; 29, 681-94.

I Giotis, N Molders, S Land, M Biehl, MF Jonkman and N Petkov. MED-NODE: A computer-assisted melanoma diagnosis system using non-dermoscopic images. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015; 42, 6578-85.

SHS Moosavi and VK Bardsiri. Satin bowerbird optimizer: A new optimization algorithm to optimize ANFIS for software development effort estimation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2017; 60, 1-15.

P Lakshminarayana and TV SureshKumar. Automatic generation and optimization of test case using hybrid cuckoo search and bee colony algorithm. J. Intell. Syst. 2020; 30, 59-72.

SK Dubey and B Jasra. Reliability assessment of component based software systems using fuzzy and ANFIS techniques. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2017; 8, 1319-26.

T Jie, Z Yong and W Lina. Neural network based software reliability prediction with the feed of testing process knowledge. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering, Beijing. 2012, p. 19-27.

A Kaushik, S Verma, HJ Singh and G Chhabra. Software cost optimization integrating fuzzy system and COA-Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2017; 8, 1461-71.

A Zaryabi and AB Hamza. A neural network approach for optimal software testing and maintenance. Neural Comput. Appl. 2014; 24, 453-61.

W Jian, D Hui and D Lau. Nanoengineering in biomedicine: Current development and future perspectives. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2020; 9, 700-15.

D Kim, K Shin, SG Kwon and T Hyeon. Synthesis and biomedical applications of multifunctional nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2018; 30, 1802309.

Q Yan, H Dong, J Su, J Han, B Song, Q Wei and Y Shi. A review of 3D printing technology for medical applications. Engineering 2018; 4, 729-42.

J Li, Y Liu, J Ren, BZ Tay, T Luo, L Fan, D Sun, G Luo, D Lau, Marcos and RHW Lam. Antibody-coated microstructures for selective isolation of immune cells in blood. Lab Chip 2020; 20, 1072-82.

M Karplus and JA McCammon. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002; 9, 646-52.

MJ Buehler. Atomistic modeling of materials failure. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2008.

S Ramakrishna, J Mayer, E Wintermantel and KW Leong. Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001; 61, 1189-224.

M Niinomi. Recent metallic materials for biomedical applications. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2002; 33, 477.

MW Tibbitt, CB Rodell, JA Burdick and KS Anseth. Progress in material design for biomedical applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015; 112, 14444-51.

PK Jain, X Huang, IH El-Sayed and MA El-Sayed. Noble metals on the nanoscale: Optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008; 41, 1578-86.

S Pardeep. NiTi shape memory alloy: Physical and tribological characterization. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 2018; 27, 20180009.

AS Bale, SV Reddy and SA Huddar. Electromechanical characterization of Nitinol based RF MEMS switch. Mater. Today Proc. 2020; 27, 443-5.

AS Bale, SV Reddy and S Tiwari. Effect of residual stress on resonant frequency in Nitinol based thin film resonator. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020; 872, 012008.

SA Huddar, BG Sheeparamatti and AS Bale. Study of pull-in voltage of a perforated SMA based MEMS Switch. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems, Vellore, India. 2017, p. 1-4.

E Okur and M Turkan. A survey on automated melanoma detection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2018; 73, 50-67.

Melanoma.Org, Melanoma facts and statistics, Available at: https://www.melanoma.org.au /understanding-melanoma/melanoma-facts-and-statistics/, accessed July 2017.

Medicine Net, What is melanoma?, Available at: http://www.medicinenet.com/melanoma/ article.htmwhat-is-melanoma, accessed July 2017.

PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, PDQ Melanoma treatment, Available at: https:// www.cancer.gov/types/skin/patient/melanoma-treatment-pdq, accessed February 2018.

PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/pdq/ editorial-boards/adult-treatment, accessed December 2018.

AD Katsambas, TM Lotti, C Dessinioti and AM D’Erme. European handbook of dermatological treatments. Springer, 2015.

E Senel. Dermatoscopy of non-melanocytic skin tumors. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2011; 77, 16-21.

MA Msrtinez-del-Amor, I Perez-Hurtado, D Orellana-Martin and MJ Perez-Jimenez. Adaptative parallel simulators for bioinspired computing models. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020; 107, 469-84.

G Paun. Computing with membranes. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 2000; 61, 108-43

D Diaz-Pernil, C Graciani-Diaz, MA Gutierrez-Naranjo, I Perez-Hurtado and MJ Perez-Jimenez. Software for P systems. In: G Paun, G Rozenberg and A Salomaa (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of membrane computing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2010, p. 437-54.

J Blakes, J Twycross, FJ Romero-Campero and N Krasnogor. The Infobiotics Workbench: An integrated in silico modelling platform for Systems and Synthetic Biology. Bioinformatics 2011; 27, 3323-4.

TFD Lima, AN Tait, A Mehrabian, A Mehrabian, MA Nahmias, C Huang, HT Peng, BA Marquez, M Miscuglio, T El-Ghazawi, VJ Sorger, BJ Shastri and PR Prucnal. Primer on silicon neuromorphic photonic processors: Architecture and compiler. Nanophotonics 2020; 9, 4055-73.

T Rudolph. Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing. APL Photonics 2017; 2, 030901.

JW Silverstone, D Bonneau, JL O’Brien and MG Thompson. Silicon quantum photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2016; 22, 390-402.

D Brunner, MC Soriano, CR Mirasso and I Fischer. Parallel photonic information processing at gigabyte per second data rates using transient states. Nat. Commun. 2013; 4, 1364.

K Vandoorne, P Mechet, TV Vaerenbergh, M Fiers, G Morthier, D Verstraeten, B Schrauwen, J Dambre and P Bienstman. Experimental demonstration of reservoir computing on a silicon photonics chip. Nat. Commun. 2014; 5, 3541.

MC Soriano, D Brunner, M Escalona-Moran, CR Mirasso and I Fischer. Minimal approach to neuro-inspired information processing. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2015; 9, 68.

F Duport, A Smerieri, A Akrout, M Haelterman and S Massar. Fully analogue photonic reservoir computer. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6, 22381.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-15

How to Cite

Bale, A. S. ., Tiwari, S. ., Khatokar, A. ., N, V. ., & Mohan M S, K. . (2021). Bio-Inspired Computing-A Dive into Critical Problems, Potential Architecture and Techniques. Trends in Sciences, 18(23), 703. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2021.703