Diatom Assemblages and Their Interrelationships between Different Water Quality Parameters in Gorveshwari River of Bangladesh

Authors

  • Zannatul Ferdoushi Department of Fisheries Management, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • K. M. Touphiq Hassan Department of Fisheries Management, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Md. Shahanur Alam Department of Fisheries Management, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Md. Abul Kalam Azad Department of Fisheries Management, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Yeasmin Ara Department of Fisheries Management, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Mst. Masuma Khatun Department of Aquaculture, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2023.6697

Keywords:

Diatom, Water quality, Environment, Abundance, Physico-chemical, Diversity, Interrelationship

Abstract

The main objectives of this study were to assess the diversity of diatom species and explain how physico-chemical factors and trophic levels interact with diatom assemblages. An assemblage of diatom communities in a riverine environment was assessed through forthright sampling for a period of 7 months from September 2019 to March 2020. Three sampling sites from the upstream, midstream and downstream parts of a river located in the northwest part of Bangladesh were selected for water quality analysis. A variety of multivariate data analyses were done to evaluate the environmental and biological data as well as to observe their interrelationships. A total of 7 genera of Diatom namely Nitzschia, Diatoma, Melosira, Synedra, Tabillaria, Navicula, and Fragillaria were recorded. Nitzschia was the most dominant genus compared to the other genus at downstream with an abundance of 1.92×103 cells/L while Tabillaria sp. was noted as a rare one with the lowest abundance of 0.37×103 cells/L at the midstream site. The interrelationship analysis clarified that water temperature positively altered the distribution of Melosira, Navicula, and Tabillaria while its abundance was less dependent on dissolved oxygen and pH. The results from a 2-dimensional Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS) revealed the abundance of diatom at downstream was statistically higher than upstream and midstream. Hence, the study concluded that the diatom composition was very sensitive to the physico-chemical parameters according to water direction and could be used as a bio-indicator to assess the surface water quality.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Diatom species composition was very sensitive to water quality indicators
  • Diatom assemblages can be used as a bio-indicator to assess the water quality
  • Diatom concentration was statistically higher at downstream compared to upstream and midstream


GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

MJ Mia, J Naher, MG Azom, MSR Sabuz, MH Islam and MR Islam. Spatiotemporal variations in finfish assemblage and diversity indices in relation to ecological indicators of the Atrai River, Dinajpur, Bangladesh. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2019; 45, 175-82.

Y Ara, M Zannat, SE Jahan, Z Ferdoushi and K Fatema. Limnological aspects of a riverine water body: a case study of Dhepa River in Bangladesh. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 2018; 13, 141-9.

K Fatema, M Begum, MA Zahid and ME Hossain. Water quality assessment of the river Buriganga, Bangladesh. J. Biodivers. Conserv. Bioresour. Manag. 2018; 4, 47-54.

CN Solak and E Acs. Water quality monitoring in European and Turkish rivers using diatoms. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2011; 11, 329-37.

PJ Lopez, J Descles, AE Allen and C Bowler. Prospects in diatom research. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005; 16, 180-6.

CN Solak. The application of diatom indices in the upper Porsuk Creek Kutahya-Turkey. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2011; 11, 31-6.

J Soininen. Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms a review. Diat. Res. 2007; 22, 473-90.

RJ Stevenson, ML Bothwell and RL Lowe. Algal ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, 1996, p. 184-96.

GAO Moser, FR Piedras, ABJ Oaquim, DS Souza, SG Leles, DT Lima, ABA Ramos, CO Farias and AM Fernandes. Tidal effects on phytoplankton assemblages in a near‐pristine estuary: A trait‐based approach for the case of a shallow tropical ecosystem in Brazil. Mar. Ecol. 2017; 38, 1-18.

A Abonyi, E Acs, A Hidas, I Grigorszky, G Varbiro, G Borics, and KT Kiss. Functional diversity of phytoplankton highlights long‐term gradual regime shift in the middle section of the Danube River due to global warming, human impacts, and oligotrophication. Freshwater Biol. 2018; 63, 456-72.

JG Kim, JH Gwak, MY Jung, SU An, JH Hyun, S Kang and SK Rhee. Distinct temporal dynamics of planktonic archaeal and bacterial assemblages in the bays of the Yellow Sea. PLoS One 2019; 14, e0221408.

FC Bom and LA Colling. Impact of vehicles on benthic macrofauna on a subtropical sand beach. Mar. Ecol. 2020; 41, e12595.

CN Solak, K Pabuccu, M Barlas and G Feher. Use of epilithic diatoms to evaluate water quality of Akcay Stream (Buyuk-Menderes River) in Mugla/Turkey. Hydrobiologia 2007; 17, 327-38.

R Klais, V Norros, S Lehtinen, T Tammienen and K Olli. Community assembly and drivers of phytoplankton functional structure. Funct. Ecol. 2017; 31, 760-7.

RMC Santana, M Dolbethb, JEL Barbosa and J Patrício. Narrowing the gap: Phytoplankton functional diversity in two disturbed tropical estuaries. Ecol. Indicat. 2017; 86, 81-93.

M Lee, BS Park and SH Baek. Tidal influences on biotic and abiotic factors in the Seomjin River Estuary and Gwangyang Bay, Korea. Estuar. Coast. 2018; 41, 1977-93.

HMDJ Affe, FR Piedras, LM Santana, GAO Moser, M Menezes and JMDC Nunes. Phytoplankton functional groups: Short‐term variation in a tropical tidal‐ forced estuarine system. Mar. Ecol. 2019; 40, e12555.

SH Baek, D Kim, YO Kim, M Son, YJ Kim, M Lee and BS Park. Seasonal changes in abiotic environmental conditions in the Busan coastal region (South Korea) due to the Nakdong River in 2013 and effect of these changes on phytoplankton communities. Continent. Shelf Res. 2019; 175, 116-26.

JT Bhaskar, BV Parli and SC Tripathy. Spatial and seasonal variations of dinoflagellates and ciliates in the Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Mar. Ecol. 2020; 41, 1-12.

American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Vol II. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, 1992.

EG Bellinger. A key to the common algae. The Institution of Water and Environmental Management, London, England, 1997, p. 138.

MR Pontin. A key to the freshwater planktonic and semi-planktonic Rotifera of the British Isles. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication, Ambleside, England, 1978, p. 197.

ME Lind and AJ Brook. A key to common desmids of the English lake district. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication, Cumbria, England, 1980, p. 122.

MS Rahman. Water quality management: Aquaculture. BRAC Prokashona, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1992, p. 84.

CE Boyd and CS Tucker. Pond aquaculture water quality management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1998, p. 8-86.

B Joseph and SM Yamakanamardi. Monthly changes in the abundance and biomass of zooplankton and water quality parameters in Kukkarahalli Lake of Mysore, India. J. Environ. Biol. 2011; 32, 551-7.

M Rashed-Un-Nabi, MA Al-Mamun, MH Ullah and MG Mustafa. Temporal and spatial distribution of fish and shrimp assemblage in the Bakkhali river estuary of Bangladesh in relation to some water quality parameters. Mar. Biol. Res. 2011; 7, 436-52.

MR Al-Mamun, S Kader, MS Islam and MZH Khan. Photocatalytic activity improvement and application of UV-TiO2 photocatalysis in textile wastewater treatment: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019; 7, 103-48.

W Waseem, M Sulaiman, S Islam, P Kumam, R Nawaz, MAZ Raja and M Shoaib. A study of changes in temperature profile of porous fin model using cuckoo search algorithm. Alexandria Eng. J. 2020; 59, 11-24.

IO Growns and JE Growns. Ecological effects of flow regulation on macroinvertebrate and periphytic diatom assemblages in the Hawkesbury - Nepean River, Australia. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag. 2001; 17, 275-93.

F Maraslioglu and EN Soylu. Relationship of epilithic diatom communities to environmental variables in Yedikır Dam Lake (Amasya, Turkey). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017; 17, 1347-56.

L Cibils Martina, R Principe and N Gari. Effect of a dam on epilithic algal communities of a mountain stream: Before-after dam construction comparison. J. Limnol. 2013; 72, 79-94.

L Gallo, M Battegazzore, A Corapi and L Lucadamo. Changes in epilithic diatom communities and periphytic biomass downstream of a reservoir on a Mediterranean river (Calabria region, S Italy). Turk. J. Bot. 2015; 39, 555-69.

VM Algarte, B Dunck, JA Leandrini and L Rodrigues. Periphytic diatom ecological guilds in floodplain: Ten years after dam. Ecol. Indic. 2016; 69, 407-14.

IO Growns. Is genus or species identification of periphytic diatoms required to determine the impacts of river regulation? J. Appl. Phycol. 1999; 11, 273-83.

HJ Krajenbrink, M Acreman, MJ Dunbar, L Greenway, DM Hannah, CL Laize and PJ Wood. Diatoms as indicators of the effects of river impoundment at multiple spatial scales. PeerJ 2019; 7, e8092.

EA Bergey, N Desianti and JT Cooper. Characterization of the diatom flora in the Lower Mountain Fork (Oklahoma, USA), a novel regulated river with a disjunct population of the diatom Didymosphenia geminata (Bacillariophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 2017; 52, 225-37.

T Dalu, RJ Wasserman, ML Magoro, T Mwedzi, PW Froneman and OLF Weyl. Variation partitioning of benthic diatom community matrices: Effects of multiple variables on benthic diatom communities in an Austral temperate river system. Sci. Total Environ. 2017; 601, 73-82.

H Bennion, TA Davidson, GL Simpson, N Solovieva, N Rose, S Theophile, HD Yang, NJ Anderson, SJ Brooks, S Peglar. Identification of reference lakes and evaluation of palaeoecological approaches to define reference conditions for UK (England, Wales, Scotland & North Ireland) ecotypes. Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2004, p. 1-149.

J Naymik, Y Pan and J Ford. Diatom assemblages as indicators of timber harvest effects in coastal Oregon streams. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 2005; 24, 569-84.

PA Pryfogle. Seasonal distribution of periphytic diatoms communities of Tymochtee Creek. In: Proceedings of the Sandusky River Basin Symposium. International Joint Commission, Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, U.S.A, 1975, p. 153-73.

Y Sawai. Distribution of living and dead diatoms in tidal wetlands of northern Japan: Relations to taphonomy. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2001; 173, 125-41.

GS Hassan, MA Espinosa and FI Isla. Fidelity of dead diatom assemblages in estuarine sediments: how much environmental information is preserved? Palaios 2008; 23, 112-20.

CE Shannon and W Weaver. The mathematical theory of communications, University of Illinois, Press, Urbana IL, 1963, p. 125.

EH Simpson. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949; 163, 688.

EC Pielou. Species-diversity and pattern diversity in the study of ecological succession. J. Theor. Biol. 1996; 10, 370-83.

JP Descy and V Gosselain. Development and ecological importance of phytoplankton in a large lowland river (River Meuse, Belgium). In: Phytoplankton in turbid environments: Rivers and shallow lakes, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1994, p. 139-55.

AG Nyakweba and KE Migiro. Effects of selected water quality parameters on phytoplankton abundance and diversity in river Chepkoilel, Eldoret, Kenya. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2014; 2, 863-71.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-26

How to Cite

Ferdoushi, Z. ., Hassan, K. M. T., Alam, M. S. ., Azad, M. A. K. ., Ara, Y., & Khatun, M. M. . (2023). Diatom Assemblages and Their Interrelationships between Different Water Quality Parameters in Gorveshwari River of Bangladesh. Trends in Sciences, 20(9), 6697. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2023.6697