In Vitro Rapid Multiplication of a Highly Valuable Ornamental Aquatic Plant Anubias Heterophylla

Authors

  • Suphat Rittirat Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80280, Thailand
  • Kanchit Thammasiri Department of Plant Science, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • Sutha Klaocheed Department of Technology and Industries, Faculty of Science and Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani campus, Pattani 94000, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2021.3

Keywords:

Aquatic plant, Auxins, Cytokinins, Micropropagation, Plant growth regulators

Abstract

The present study focuses on the development of a micropropagation protocol for true to type plants of Anubias heterophylla, a valuable ornamental aquatic plant. Natural propagation of aquatic species is limited due to the production of a small number of plants with a long cultivation period, disease and requirement of a large space for propagation. Surface-disinfected shoot tip explants were cultured on MS medium containing 0.1 % (w/v) activated charcoal (AC) and supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) at different concentrations (0, 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0 mg/L) either singly or in combination with alpha Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) (0.5 and 1.0 mg/L). Among different auxins and cytokinin used, the number of shoots initiated per explant varied significantly among the different auxin and cytokinin combinations. The highest number of shoots per explants (3.60 ± 0.24) was formed in the culture medium containing 1.0 mg/L NAA in combination with 1.0 mg/L BAP, followed by in the culture medium with 3.0 mg/L BAP (2.40 ± 0.24). In the culture medium with 1.0 mg/L NAA and 1.0 mg/L BAP, 100 % of the cultured explants regenerated new shoots within 60 days. The maximum number of roots (19.80 ± 0.20 roots) per explant was observed after 60 days of culture on MS medium contained 0.1 % (w/v) AC and supplemented with 1.0 mg/L NAA and 1.0 mg/L BAP. With a 100% survival rate, the regenerated plantlets were effectively acclimatized to submerged underwater environments. Plantlets exhibited phenotypic traits that were comparable to those of their donor plant. This protocol is suited for commercial Anubias heterophylla propagation in the aquarium industry.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The development of a micropropagation protocol for true to type plants of Anubias heterophylla
  • The initiation of aseptic cultures of Anubias heterophylla from shoot tip explants
  • Optimization of culture medium for shoot proliferation
  • Rooting micro shoots and hardening of rooted micro shoots

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anubias Heterophylla Aquatic Plants, Available at: https://shop.glassaqua.com/products/anubias-heterophylla, accessed April 2020.

J Carter and AHLAN Gunawardena. Regeneration of the aquatic monocot Aponogeton madagascariensis (lace plant) through callus induction. Aquat. Bot. 2011; 94, 143-9.

JO Myung, RN Hye, C Hong-Keun, RL Jang and WK Suk. High frequency plant regeneration system for Nymphoides coreana via somatic embryogenesis from zygotic embryo-derived embryogenic cell suspension cultures. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010; 4, 125-8.

K Kanchanapoom, P Chunui and K Kanchanapoom. Micropropagation of Anubias barteri var. Nana from shoot tip culture and the analysis of ploidy stability. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. Cluj-Napoca 2012; 40, 148-51.

S Klaocheed, W Jehsu, W Choojun, K Thammasiri, S Prasertsongskun and S Rittirat. Induction of direct shoot organogenesis from shoot tip explants of an ornamental aquatic plant, Cryptocoryne wendtii. Walailak J. Sci. Tech. 2020; 17, 293-302.

CZ Liu, SJ Murch, JC Jain and PK Saxena. Goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis L.): In vitro regeneration for germplasm conservation and elimination of heavy metal contamination. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2004; 40, 75-9.

B Khilwani, A Kaur, R Ranjan and A Kumar. Direct somatic embryogenesis and encapsulation of somatic embryos for in vitro conservation of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016; 127, 433-42.

V Patial, M Sharma and A Bhattacharya. Potential of thidiazuron in improved micropropagation of Picrorhiza kurroa - an endangered medicinal herb of alpine Himalaya. Plant Biosyst. 2015; 151, 729-36.

ZM Ren, YP Xia, D Zhang, Y Li and Y Wu. Cytological analysis of the bulblet initiation and development in Lycoris species. Scientia Horticulturae 2017; 218, 72-9.

T Murashige and F Skoog. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962; 15, 473-97.

K Yadav, A Aggarwal and N Singh. Evaluation of genetic fidelity among micropropagated plants of Gloriosa superba L. using DNA-based markers - a potential medicinal plant. Fitoterapia 2013; 89, 265-70.

DT Nhut. The control of In vitro direct main stem formation of Lilium longiflorum derived from receptacle culture and rapid propagation by using In vitro stem nodes. Plant Growth Regul. 2003; 40, 179-84.

CB Fráguas, M Pasqual, LF Dutra and O Cazzeta. Micropropagation of fig (Ficus carica L.) ‘Roxo de Valinhos’ plants. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant. 2004; 40, 471-4.

PR Poudel, I Kataoka and R Mochioka. Effect of plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Vitis ficifolia var. ganeba and its interspecific hybrid grape. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2005; 4, 466-71.

D Van Staden. Plant growth regulators, II: cytokinins, their analogues and inhibitors. In: EF George, MA Hall and GJD Klerk (Eds.). Plant propagation by tissue culture. 3rd ed. Springer, Netherlands, 2008, p. 205-26.

DH Abadi and BK Livani. In vitro proliferation of an important medicinal plant Aloe - a method for rapid production. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2010; 4, 216-22.

J Gubis, Z Lajchova and J Farago. Effect of genotype and explants type on shoot regeneration in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2003; 39, 9-14.

S Ishag, MG Osman and MM Khalafalla. Effects of growth regulators, explants and genotype on shoot regeneration in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv Omdurman). Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2009; 4, 7-13.

S Mukhtar, N Ahmad, MI Khan, M Anis and IM Aref. Influencing micropropagation in Clitoria ternatea L. through the manipulation of TDZ levels and use of different explants types. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2012; 18, 381-6.

SD Yancheva, S Golubowicz, E Fisher, MA Lev-Yadum and MA Flaishman. Auxin type and timing of application determine the activation of the developmental program during in vitro organogenesis in apple. Plant Sci. 2003; 165, 299-309.

S Ignacimuthu, S Arockiasamy, M Antonysamy and P Ravichandran. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from mature leaf explants of Eryngium foetidum, a condiment. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999; 56, 131-7.

W Xing, M Boa, H Qin and G Ning. Micropropagation of Rosa rugose through axillary shoot proliferation. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 2010; 52, 69-75.

CJU Kim, SO Jee and JD Chung. In vitro micropropagation of Rosa hybrid L. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2003; 5, 115-9.

CL Kuo, DC Agrawal, HC Chang, YT Chiu, CP Huang, YL Chen, SH Huang and HS Tsay. In vitro culture and production of syringing and rutin in Saussurea involucrata (Kar. Et Kir.) - an endangered medicinal plant. Bot. Stud. 2015; 56, 12.

N Ahmad and M Anis. Rapid plant regeneration protocol for cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007; 82, 585-9.

F Skoog and CO Miller. Chemical regulation of growth and organ function in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1957; 11, 118-30.

S Vanneste and J Friml. Auxin: A trigger for change in plant development. Cell 2009; 136, 1005-16.

I Blilou, J Xu, M Wildwater, V Willemsen, I Paponov, J Friml, R Heidstra, M Aida, K Palme and B Scheres. The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature 2005; 433, 39-44.

N Braun, J Wyrzykowska, P Muller, K David, D Couch, C Perrot-Reichenmann and AJ Fleming. Conditional repression of AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN1 reveals that it coordinates cell division and cell expansion during postembryonic shoot development in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell 2008; 20, 2746-62.

Y Cheng, X Dai and Y Zhao. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases controls the formation of floral organs and vascular tissues in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2006; 20, 1790-9.

Y Cheng, X Dai and Y Zhao. Auxin synthesized by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases is essential for embryogenesis and leaf formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007; 19, 2430-9.

D Miroshnichenko, I Chaban, M Chernobrovkina and S Dolgov. Protocol for efficient regulation of in vitro morphogenesis in einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.), a recalcitrant diploid wheat species. PLoS One 2017; 12, e0173533.

AM Dimech, R Cross, R Ford and PWJ Taylor. Micropropagation of Gymea lily (Doryanthes excelsa Corrêa) from New South Wales, Australia. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007; 88, 157-65.

EV Boltenkov, VG Rybin and EV Zarembo. Specific features of cultivation of Iris ensata Thunb. callus tissue. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2004; 40, 206-12.

JL Ramsay, DS Galitz and CW Lee. Basal medium and sucrose concentration influence regeneration of Easter lily in ovary culture. HortScience 2003; 38, 404-6.

IA Tamas. Hormonal regulation of apical dominance. Springer, Amsterdam, 1995.

NS Rangaswamy. Somatic embryogenesis in angiosperm cell tissue and organ cultures. Proc. Plant Sci. 1986; 96, 247-71.

A Ji, X Geng, Y Zhang and G Wu. Advances in somatic embryogenesis research of horticultural Plants. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2011; 2, 727-32.

VM Jimenez. Regulation of in vitro somatic embryogenesis with emphasis on to the role of endogenous hormones. Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg. 2001; 13, 196-223.

AP Sagare, YL Lee, TC Lin, CC Chen and HS Tsay. Cytokinin-induced somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Corydalis yanhusuo (Fumariaceae) - a medicinal plant. Plant Sci. 2000; 160, 139-47.

WM Gray. Hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2, e311.

X Yang and X Zhang. Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in higher plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2010; 29, 36-57.

F Gomes, M Simões, ML Lopes and M Canhoto. Effect of plant growth regulators and genotype on the micropropagation of adult trees of Arbutus unedo L. (strawberry tree). New Biotechnol. 2010; 27, 882-92.

UI Shehu, LA Sani and AB Ibrahim. Auxin induced rooting of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L. Miller) cladodes for rapid on-farm propagation. Afr. J Agr. Res. 2016; 11, 898-900.

P Overvoorde, H Fukaki and T Beeckman. Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010; 2, a001537.

CM Fogaca and AG Fett-Neto. Role of auxin and its modulators in the adventitious rooting of Eucalyptus species differing in recalcitrance. Plant Growth Regul. 2005; 45, 1-10.

TI Pop, D Pamfil and C Bellini. Auxin control in the formation of adventitious roots. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. Cluj-Napoca 2011; 39, 307-16.

SP Yan, RH Yang, F Wang, LN Sun and XS Song. Effect of auxins and associated metabolic changes on cuttings of hybrid aspen. Forests 2017; 8, 117.

A Aygun and H Dumanoglu. In vitro shoot proliferation and in vitro and ex vitro root formation of Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pallas. Front. Plant Sci. 2015; 6, 225.

N Fatima and M Anis. Role of growth regulators on in vitro regeneration and histological analysis in Indian ginseng (Withania somnifera L.) Dunal. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2012; 18, 59-67.

A Pierret, CJ Christopher and MC Doussan. Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. New Phytol. 2005; 166, 967-80.

GE Sheeja, A Joseph and A Korath. In vitro propagation of an ornamental aquatic plant, Anubias barterii Var. Nana petite. Int. J. Curr. Sci. 2015; 18, 1-12.

A Mathur, AK Mathur, P Verma, S Yadav, ML Gupta and MP Darokar. Biological hardening and genetic fidelity testing of micro-cloned progeny of Chlorophytum borivilianum. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008; 7, 1046-53.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Rittirat, S. ., Thammasiri, K. ., & Klaocheed, S. . (2021). In Vitro Rapid Multiplication of a Highly Valuable Ornamental Aquatic Plant Anubias Heterophylla. Trends in Sciences, 18(19), 3. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2021.3