Mothers’ Cooking: Perspectives of Givers and Takers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.2998Keywords:
Mothers’ cooking, Perspective of givers, Perspective of takersAbstract
The burden of malnutrition of children is a global challenge. Promoting mothers to prepare their own meals at home is indicated as an important strategy to prevent malnutrition and improve nutrition in children. Despite the fact that meals prepared by mothers are healthier, little is known about what cooking means in the Thai context. This descriptive qualitative research is intended to describe the perceptions and perspectives of mothers’ cooking among Thai mothers and school-age children. Descriptive qualitative research, using in-depth interviews with 10 mothers aged 31 to 80 years old and 10 school-age children aged 10 to 12 years old, was conducted. Participants were selected using purposive sampling from 10 sub-districts that are partners of the mothers’ cooking network project of Songkhla province. Data were analyzed using content analysis. The results provided by the mothers' and children's perspectives indicated that Thais perceived mothers’ cooking quite differently based on whether the perspective toward mothers is as the giver or whether the children addressed the perspective of the taker. For the giver, mothers’ cooking was defined in terms of the power of love, happiness time, feeling of self-worth, and mother’s role and responsibility. For the taker, mothers’ cooking was defined in terms of the best thing and the most delicious, family relationship, giving and sharing, and demonstration of love and care. Additionally, this study highlighted that the mother’s perception of cooking can be divided into 3 steps, namely, preparation, cooking and eating together. These findings may help in determining how public health programs can be improved and the role of mothers promoted within a healthy nutrition strategy.
HIGHLIGHTS
- The provision of optimal nutrition during childhood is critical to good health, growth, and development
- “Mother's cooking” is still a common tradition in Thai culture and daily life, but little is known about Thai attitudes toward mothers’ food
- Cooking activities demonstrated the mothers’ love and transferred their wisdom to their children
- Eating meals as a family strengthened bonds and became a family rule or habit passed down from generation to generation
Downloads
Metrics
References
VJB Martins, TMM Toledo Florêncio, LP Grillo, M Do Carmo P Franco, PA Martins, APG Clemente, CDL Santos, MFA Vieira and AL Sawaya. Long-lasting effects of undernutrition. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 2011; 8, 1817-46
Global Health Observatory (GHO) data, Available at: https://www.who.int/gho/child-malnutrition/ en/, accessed June 2020.
Food and Agriculture Organization, Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E, accessed May 2017.
AJ Hammons and BH Fiese. Is frequency of shared family meals related to the nutritional health of children and adolescents? Pediatrics 2011; 127, e1565-e1574.
JA Fulkerson, N Larson, M Horning and D Neumark-Sztainer. A review of associations between family or shared meal frequency and dietary and weight status outcomes across the lifespan. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2014; 46, 2-19.
JA Wolfson and SN Bleich. Is cooking at home associated with better diet quality or weight-loss intention? Publ. Health Nutr. 2015; 18, 1397-406.
MS Christian, CEL Evans, N Hancock, C Nykiaer and JE Cade. Family meals can help children reach their 5 A Day: A cross-sectional survey of children's dietary intake from London primary schools. J. Epidemiol Community Health 2013; 67, 332-8.
World Health Organization. Healthy nutrition: The role of woman. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000, p. 2-4.
W Takeda, MK Melby and Y Ishikawa. Who eats with family and how often? Household members and work styles influence frequency of family meals in urban Japan. Appetite 2018; 125, 160-71.
B Sen. The relationship between frequency of family dinner and adolescent problem behaviors after
adjusting for other family characteristics. J. Adolesc. 2010; 33, 187-96.
ME Eisenberg, D Neumark-Sztainer, JA Fulkerson and M Story. Family meals and substance use: Is
there a long-term protective association? J. Adolesc. Health 2008; 43, 151-6.
F Lavelle, L McGowan, M Spence, M Caraher, MM Raats, L Hollywood, D McDowell, A McCloat, E Mooney and M Dean. Barriers and facilitators to cooking from 'scratch' using basic or raw ingredients: A qualitative interview study. Appetite 2016; 107, 383-91.
S Mills, M White, W Wrieden, H Brown, M Stead and J Adams. Home food preparation practices, experiences and perceptions: A qualitative interview study with photo-elicitation. PLos One 2017; 12, e0182842.
S Chukumnird, W Pruksasri, J Sangsawang, S Puijarone, O Rongsawat and S Pruksasri. Development of food and nutritional management model using mother’s food guideline, Phawong sub-district: A participatory action research. J. Nurs. Health Care 2017; 35, 214-23.
W Aekplakorn. Thai National Health Examination Survey V. Health System Research Institute, Nonthaburi, Thailand, 2016, p. 89-105.
F Short. Domestic cooking skills: What are they? J. Home Econ. Inst. Aust. 2003; 10, 13-22.
F Short. Kitchen secrets: The meaning of cooking in everyday life. Berg, Oxford, England, 2006, p. 27-9.
M Carrigan, I Szmigin and S Leek. Managing routine food choices in UK families: The role of convenience consumption. Appetite 2006; 47, 372-83.
SDH Mills, JA Wolfson, WL Wrieden, H Brown, M White and J Adams. Perceptions of ‘home cooking’: A qualitative analysis from the United Kingdom and United States. Nutrients 2020; 12, 198.
MA Neergaard, F Olesen, RS Andersen and J Sondergaard. Qualitative description-the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med. Res. Meth. 2009; 9, 52.
M Sandelowski. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res. Nurs. Health 2000; 23, 334-40.
G Guest, A Bunce and L Johnson. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Meth. 2006; 18, 59-82.
DF Polit and CT Beck. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, United States, 2012, p. 408.
JR Gray, SK Grove and S Sutherland. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 8th ed. Elsevier, Missouri, United States, 2017, p. 268.
UH Graneheim and B Lundman. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs. Educ. Today 2004; 24, 105-12.
JA Wolfson, SN Bleich, KC Smith and S Frattaroli. What does cooking mean to you? Perceptions of cooking and factors related to cooking behavior. Appetite 2016; 97, 146-54.
JC Kaufmann. The meaning of cooking. Polity Press, Cambridge, England, 2010, p.183-4.
L Heslop, J Madill, L Duxbury and M Dowdles. Doing what has to be done: Strategies and orientations of married and single working mothers for food tasks. J. Consum. Behav. 2007; 6, 75-93.
IA Ana, D Schoolmeester, M Dekker and WMF Jongen. To cook or not to cook: A means-end study of motives for choice of meal solutions. Food Qual. Preference 2007; 18, 77-88.
R Dixey. Gender perspectives on food and cooking skills. Br. Food J. 1996; 98, 35-41.
D Simmons and GE Chapman. The significance of home cooking within families. Br. Food J. 2012; 114, 1184-95.
C Evers, M Adriaanse, DTD de Ridder and JC de Witt Huberts. Good mood food. Positive emotion as neglected trigger for food intake. Appetite 2013; 68, 1-7.
HRH Rockett. Family dinner: More than just a meal. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2007; 107, 1498-501.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
