Load Frequency Control for multiarea Power System using Secondary Controllers

Authors

  • Nagendra Kumar Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, G. L. Bajaj Institute of Technology & Management, Greater Noida 201306, India
  • Akhilesh Singh Department of Electrical Engineering, Seemant Institute of Technology Pithoragarh, Uttrakhand 262501, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.2044

Keywords:

Automatic Control Error (ACE), Fuzzy logic control (FLC), Load frequency control (LFC), Model predictive control (MPC), Proportional-integral-derivative (PID)

Abstract

Load frequency control (LFC) is essential for the stable operation of a power system network. The principal task of LFC is to manage the output of the generator with respect to change in the network frequency and tie-line power; such as to restore the scheduled frequency and power exchange with other areas in a prescribe bounds. This paper carries out an analysis of the LFC for 2 areas reheat thermal system and 4 areas thermal reheat system using a generation rate constraint (GRC), by comparison of performances of secondary controllers like model predictive control (MPC), proportional integral derivative (PID), and Fuzzy cascaded PID as load frequency control scheme. A well-known optimization algorithm, i.e., Big Bang Big Crunch (BBBC) is used to obtain optimal gains of PID controllers. Various load perturbations in different areas have been considered to check the response of the controllers.  Comparative analysis of the results has been obtained in terms of overshoot, undershoot and settling time. It is seen that in all cases, apart from some peaky oscillation in responses, MPC performs better than other controllers, specifically in terms of settling time. The robustness of the MPC controller is also more evident than the other controllers.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Two area and 4 area thermal power systems have been taken for the case study
  • PID, Fuzzy cascaded PID and MPC control schemes have been designed for the LFC
  • A simulation model of the 2 and 4 areas power systems is presented and used to design control schemes
  • The performance and effectiveness of all control approaches have been examined under different disturbance scenarios

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

KS Rajesh and SS Dash. Load frequency control of autonomous power system using adaptive fuzzy based PID controller optimized on improved sine cosine algorithm. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019; 10, 2361-73.

M Farahani, S Ganjefar and M Alizadeh. PID controller adjustment using chaotic optimisation algorithm for multi-area load frequency control. IET Control Theory Appl. 2012; 6, 1984-92.

A Khodabakhshia, ME Pour and R Hooshmand. Design of a robust load frequency control using sequential quadratic programming technique. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2012; 40, 1-8.

DK Sambariya and R Prasad. Design of harmony search algorithm based tuned fuzzy logic power system stabilizer. Int. Rev. Electr. Eng. 2013; 8, 1594-607.

KS Xiahou, Y Liu and QH Wu. Robust load frequency control of power systems against random time-delay attacks. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021; 12, 909-11.

Z Yan and Y Xu. Data-driven load frequency control for stochastic power systems: A deep reinforcement learning method with continuous action search. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019; 34, 1653-6.

H Gozde and MC Taplamacioglu. Automatic generation control application with craziness based particle swarm optimization in a thermal power system. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2011; 33, 8-16.

SK Aditya and D Das. Design of load frequency controllers using genetic algorithm for two area interconnected hydropower system. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2003; 31, 81-94.

ZW Geem, JH Kim and GV Loganathan. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation 2001; 76, 60-8.

W Tan. Tuning of PID load frequency controller for power systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009; 50, 1465-72.

N Kumar, B Tyagi and V Kumar. Multi-area deregulated automatic generation control scheme of power system using imperialist competitive algorithm based robust controller. IETE J. Res. 2017; 64, 528-37.

N Kumar, V Kumar and B Tyagi. Multi area AGC scheme using imperialist competition algorithm in restructured power system. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016; 48, 160-8.

N Kumar, B Tyagi and V Kumar. Deregulated multiarea AGC scheme using BBBC-FOPID controller. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017; 42, 2641-9.

A fathy and AM Kassem. Antlion optimizer-ANFIS load frequency control for multi-interconnected plants comprising photovoltaic and wind turbine. ISA Trans. 2019; 87, 282-96.

S Prakash and SK Sinha. Load frequency control of multi-area power systems using neuro-fuzzy hybrid intelligent controllers. IETE J. Res. 2015; 61, 526-32.

LA Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Contr. 1956; 8, 338-53.

EH Mamdani and S Assilian. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 1975; 7, 1-13.

K Charles, N Urasaki, T Senjyu, ME Lotfy and L Liu. Robust load frequency control schemes in power system using optimized PID and model predictive controllers. Energies 2018; 11, 3070.

M Ma, X Liu and C Zhang. LFC for multi-area interconnected power system concerning wind turbines based on DMPC. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2017; 11, 2689-96.

AS Mir and N Senroy. Adaptive model predictive control scheme for application of SMES for load frequency control. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2720751.

PM Namara and F Milano. Model predictive control based AGC for multi-terminal HVDC-connected AC grids. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019; 33, 1036-48.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-15

How to Cite

Kumar, N. ., & Singh, A. . (2022). Load Frequency Control for multiarea Power System using Secondary Controllers. Trends in Sciences, 19(2), 2044. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.2044