Multi-Objective Differential Evolution Algorithm with a New Environmental Parameter based Mutation for Solving Optimization Problems

Authors

  • Avjeet Singh Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India
  • Lekhraj Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India
  • Alok Kumar Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India
  • Anoj Kumar Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2021.17

Keywords:

Multi-objective optimization, Eta-heuristic algorithms, Evolutionary computational

Abstract

Simultaneous optimization of two or more objectives is an instance of multi-objective optimization (MOO). However, for most of the Multi-Objective Problems (MOPs), no single solution can optimize all the objective functions simultaneously. Evolutionary algorithms are a type of optimization algorithm used for constructing a well-distributed optimal front more quickly than a much more efficient approach. One of the most commonly used algorithms in this regard is differential evolution (DE). To solve the problem of non-dominated sorting for Multi-Objective DE (MODE), an approach is proposed that reduces the time complexity. DE is commonly recognized as one of the best methods for solving the MOPs. Several versions of DEs have been proposed for MOPs. This article proposes a novel mutation technique, named Environmental Parameter-based Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (EP-MODE) that acquires two additional environmental parameters to preserve diversity and accelerate the convergence. The proposed approach also reduces the time complexity of non-dominated sorting for Multi-Objective DE (MODE). The proposed mutation's performance has been evaluated on DTLZ series and ZDT series benchmark test functions on the Pareto-optimal front and compared with existing multi-objective algorithms (MODE and MODE-RMO). The solution comparatively verifies that the proposed EP-MODE outperforms most of the MODEs for lower dimension functions and higher functions.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • New environmental parameters-based mutation has been introduced in a differential evolution algorithm to solve multi-objective optimization problems (EP-mode)
  • The addition of two additional environmental parameters to EP-mode has been found to be appropriate for maintaining diversity while also accelerating the convergence rate
  • EP-MODE evaluated on bi-objective (DTLZ series) and tri-objective (ZDT series) benchmark test functions on the Pareto-optimal front and found EP-MODE's efficiency is higher than that of the MODE algorithm and the MODE algorithm with a ranking-based mutation operator

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

J Cheng, Z Pan, H Liang, Z Gao and J Gao. Differential evolution algorithm with fitness and diversity ranking-based mutation operator. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2021; 61, 100816.

M Bhaumik and K Maity. Multi-response optimization of EDM parameters using grey relational analysis (GRA) for Ti-5Al-2.5 Sn titanium alloy.World J. Eng. 2020; 18, 50-7.

A Singh, A Kumar and A Kumar. An enhanced differential evolution algorithm with new environmental-based parameters for solving optimization problems. In: A Hassanien, R Bhatnagar and A Darwish (Eds.). International conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications. Springer, Singapore, 2020, p. 119-29.

AA Bidgoli, S Rahnamayan and H Ebrahimpour-Komleh. Opposition-based multi-objective binary differential evolution for multi-label feature selection. In: K Deb, E Goodman, CAC Coello, K Klamroth, K Miettinen, S Mostaghim and P Reed (Eds.). International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, Cham, 2019, p. 553-64.

X Chen, W Du and F Qian. Multi-objective differential evolution with ranking-based mutation operator and its application in chemical process optimization. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2014; 136, 85-96.

YN Wang, LH Wu and XF Yaun. Multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution with elitist archive and crowding entropy-based diversity measure. Soft Comput. 2010; 14, 193-209.

W Gong and Z Cai. A multiobjective differential evolution algorithm for constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), Hong Kong, China. 2008, p. 181-8.

L Peng, Y Wang and G Dai. A novel opposition-based multi-objective differential evolution algorithm for multi-objective optimization. In: L Kang, Z Cai, X Yan and Y Liu (Eds.). Advances in computation and intelligence. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, p. 162-70.

S Kukkonen and J Lampinen. GDE3: The third evolution step of generalized differential evolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Edinburgh, UK. 2005, p. 443-50.

S Kukkonen and J Lampinen. An extension of generalized differential evolution for multi-objective optimization with constraints. In: X Yao, EK Burke, JA Lozano, J Smith, JJ Merelo-Guervos, JA Bullinaria, JE Rowe, P Tino, A Kabán and HP Schwefel (Eds.). Parallel problem solving from nature - PPSN VIII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004, p. 752-61.

BV Babu and MML Jehan. Differential evolution for multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Canberra ACT, Australia. 2003, p. 2696-703.

NK Madavan. Multiobjective optimization using a Pareto differential evolution approach. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (Cat. No. 02TH8600), Honolulu HI, USA. 2002, p. 1145-150.

K Deb, A Pratap, S Agarwal and T Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective GA: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2002; 6, 182-97.

DAV Veldhuizen and GB Lamont. On measuring multiobjective evolutionary algorithm performance. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (Cat. No. 00TH8512), La Jolla CA, USA. 2000, p. 204-11.

E Zitzler and L Thiele. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1999; 3, 257-71.

CM Fonseca and PJ Fleming. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Urbana-Champaign IL, USA. 1993, p. 416-23.

RM Storn and K Price. Differrential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. International Computer Science Institute, Report no. TR-95-012, Berkeley, 1995.

Q Fan and X Yan. Multi-objective modified differential evolution algorithm with archive-base mutation for solving multi-objective p-xylene oxidation process. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018; 29, 35-49.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-23

How to Cite

Singh, A. ., Lekhraj, L., Kumar, A. ., & Kumar, A. . (2021). Multi-Objective Differential Evolution Algorithm with a New Environmental Parameter based Mutation for Solving Optimization Problems . Trends in Sciences, 18(20), 17. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2021.17